Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:36:41 +0000
From: john larkin <jl@650pot.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Fast monostable with a transistpor array
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 06:36:41 -0700
Message-ID: <g6337jpnoa9r0scjpilip21160c2blotud@4ax.com>
References: <v4f2nm$2augj$1@dont-email.me> <v4rheb$18s4m$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
X-Trace: sv3-26EkAw2UxRQV0l/8fih8fHwXxsSrL4tj7bZzARBhgbOMh/kh0G3oIxLNPAk7ipXKoP1Q7oTJOzETUVK!fJJJn1kfjWZbNYenfckKslS6eMD5bJkcY36CJr/rgiwbZpG5Yigy5g/6NRg4oSM8XneUA3xX8K7H!ObdjJA==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2453

On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:44:37 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:

>On 14/06/2024 1:20 am, Bill Sloman wrote:
>> One option John Larjkin doesn't seem to have explored is using Renesas 
>> HFA3096 five transistor array as basis for his mononstable and level 
>> shifter.
>> 
>> It offers three 8GHz NPN parts and two 5.5GHz PNP parts in a single array.
>> 
>> https://www.renesas.com/us/en/document/dst/hfa3046-hfa3096-hfa3127-hfa3128-datasheet?r=494216
>> 
>> Two of the NPN parts could make up my emitter-coupled monostable, and 
>> the two PNP parts could level shift the output.
>> 
>> The Renesas website offers Spice models for both the NPN and the PNP 
>> transistors, which one could plug into an LTSpice simulation, at the 
>> cost of making it look too messy for the more sensitive designers to be 
>> able to look at.
>
>I've spent that last four days in hospital with Covid-19 of the colon - 
>dramatic when it started but tedious thereafter.
>
>This thread hasn't gone all that well. John Larkin has ignored the fact 
>that I was talking about just the 3096. There have been some sensible 
>comments, but I'm still too sick to try and provide any kind of summing 
>up of the sensible bits.
>
>-- 
>Bill Sloman, Sydney

OK, we can defer discussing your one-shot circuit until you feel
better. I've had some medical adventures of my own.