Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: New Bike Path
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 13:59:01 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <g9489j19h7jvmhsfedm6orfcfngupoj0ep@4ax.com>
References: <etjv8jlj9nngkc8c198gf89np71i55sc2m@4ax.com> <v6oskl$2frbh$1@dont-email.me> <z9VjO.57191$VBH2.30514@fx16.ams4> <v6qu9q$2jvdo$1@dont-email.me> <v6tqe7$3ih7q$4@dont-email.me> <v6u41v$3kevu$2@dont-email.me> <7v559j1bs0ia511gls5thk96njrfearrl7@4ax.com> <fn469jle66ns0qes1ofltqpmoguihrrs1b@4ax.com> <d7079jt0gulma0443d6a4u3tmn4n2s1obf@4ax.com> <jf089j5lrahnp7oi87594l0bles2oi23k4@4ax.com> <slrnv9831s.ibg.theise@panix2.panix.com> <4b389j902hgghq9epj8jbk0j01a23i33g9@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 19:59:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2746e9ebb2e8d1fa8f047941c7ffc9f8";
	logging-data="279469"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+oAtJBWJJkT391by5eg6YS1Y/kTdytY7U="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QmJL3GJQS7+iewnw1yv1+WugSOg=
Bytes: 3755

On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:50:33 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
wrote:

>On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 17:34:52 -0000 (UTC), Ted Heise <theise@panix.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:02:19 -0700,
>>  Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote:
>>>  On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 03:56:41 -0400, Catrike Ryder
>>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> >This morning I only walked a little over one mile, My balance issues
>>> >were bothering me, as they often do, and I must have looked like I was
>>> >totally drunk by the time I got back. I wasn't, of course. I'd last
>>> >had a couple of ounces of Cognac last night at about 1800.
>>> 
>>>  For amusement, I ran those numbers through an online blood alcohol
>>>  calculator.  
>>> <https://www.calculator.net/bac-calculator.html?csex=m&bodyweight=180&bodyweightunit=pound&thour=8&tmin=0&ba=2&bsize=b330&babv=5&wa=&wsize=c150&wabv=12&la=&lsize=s50&labv=40&oa=&osize=2&osizeunit=oz&oabv=50&x=Calculate>
>>>  The results were zero percent blood alcohol level after 8 hrs sleep. 
>>> 
>>>  I had to guess at most of the parameters:
>>>  Weight = 180 lbs
>>>  "a couple of oz" = 2 oz
>>>  Cognac is about 50% alcohol
>>>  "last night" sleep time = 8 hrs.
>>> 
>>>  I suspect that 2 oz of cognac is wrong and that "a couple of 
>>>  oz" really means the traditional "tulip glass" which is 6 oz.
>>
>>Not sure what glasses you're looking at, but they might be only 
>>partly filled (i.e., 1-2 ounces) if used anything like a snifter.
>
>Something like these:
><https://www.google.com/search?q=cognac+glasses&tbm=isch>
>However, you're right.  I didn't notice that such tulip glasses always
>are shown partly filled.  From the original text, I interpreted "a
>couple of oz" to mean two oz.  
>
>That makes me curious why one would use a rather large glass for a
>rather small amount of cognac.
><https://www.tastingtable.com/1474019/how-to-choose-glass-drink-cognac-neat/>
>"Cognac experts claim that tulip glasses give a wider range of smells
>due to the shape, whereas brandy snifters trap all of the aroma inside
>the glass leaving you with only the harsh scent of the alcohol."

Much if the enjoyment of fine brandy involves the aroma. You're
supoose cup your hand around the bottm if the snifter to warm the
brandy and release the aroma.