Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:36:30 +0000
Subject: Re: The CMBR Disproves the Big Bang.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <582d81a086d369cf0cd2e78d401de6ec@www.novabbs.com>
 <vparjj$3ints$1@dont-email.me>
 <cc6c5a5e40eb4f771dd12ce7ee558f16@www.novabbs.com>
 <4e287200afacf83d6a0412238f3e180a@www.novabbs.com>
 <vpf8kq$h0b0$3@dont-email.me> <vpg9a8$mn2j$1@dont-email.me>
 <67bdc531$0$28081$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <pkOdnbcj05T3dCL6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <67c1a0fb$1$11446$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:36:32 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <67c1a0fb$1$11446$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <gLidnUciq9CDaVz6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 60
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-UdEBVyJqrdcqpYDYeBvI3YW7xAZQccdmTMvOQaU6MtTeFMIhujyAB7oAZ8s22XjuDzHkLaMQBKF1E4F!iXxfFkoLYW/MZPi6hR0nNTgd8BcGWs7ousUJSM2wgezNXTFw2ef6wVyX5/QWT2rM7dCjwXRzfbs=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40

On 02/28/2025 03:41 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/25/2025 05:27 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>> guido wugi <wugi@brol.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Op 23/02/2025 om 14:46 schreef Paul.B.Andersen:
>>>>> Den 22.02.2025 20:18, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>>>>> The velocity-distance relation fails to explain the redshift distance
>>>>>> relation because the latter is exactly the same in every direction so
>>>>>> the former would place us at exactly the center of the universe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you still not understand that we are in the exact centre of
>>>>> the observable universe?
>>>>
>>>> He doesn't understand yet the relatitivity of the centre of the universe ;)
>>>> (even at big bang an infinite universe is still a possibility)
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is Piet Hein's take on it
>>>
>>>
>>> THE CENTRAL POINT
>>> A philosophistry
>>>
>>> I am the Universe's Centre.
>>> No subtle sceptics can confound me;
>>> for how can other viewpoints enter,
>>> when all the rest is all around me?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hard to argue with that,
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>
>> "I know a girl called Trampoline, ...".
>>
>> is a line from a song with these lines:
>>
>> "When I was three /
>> I thought the world revolved around me /
>> I was wrong."
>>
>> Infant
>
> Piet Hein is never wrong,
>
> Jan
>

In his own little world


Us stronger mathematical platonists have
a bit more thorough grounding where
we're all right.

And not "not even wrong".