Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<gc6nfjlcb89pdhu688lmag83occ0g10o3f@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux 6.11
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 02:56:38 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <gc6nfjlcb89pdhu688lmag83occ0g10o3f@4ax.com>
References: <pan$9c392$9a9d015$ad064c94$6873ea0f@gnu.rocks> <vdfd15$2e2ub$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 08:56:38 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fe7cbd131aff3ad863f4f171288df225";
	logging-data="2781860"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19nVvAJIZP6JjdNZAZrGNuEXueAWZf1mSk="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:c7NxHuI5j0lLiIu5CpQ5aIG2mek=
OS: openSUSE Leap 15.6, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2067

Phillip Frabott <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> wrote:

>Not having to rely on GTK/Qt or any 
>other X UI framework is a pretty good selling point. Means it can be used on 
>systems that require minimal X windows deployments with minimal dependencies. 
>I've never used MC myself so I can't speak to that, but there is probably a good 
>market for a minimal dependency editor in a GUI system for those who do use a 
>GUI so that's pretty cool.


Microsoft's C-centric editor for Linux is interestingly nice.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.