Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<gdgugkx5rf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Yet Another New systemd Feature Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 11:08:32 +0200 Lines: 43 Message-ID: <gdgugkx5rf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> References: <v1941f$24d4m$1@dont-email.me> <v1a0j2$2eb40$1@dont-email.me> <l9ris7F74e0U1@mid.individual.net> <v1ac52$2gs3r$2@dont-email.me> <v1bjt6$2q1db$9@dont-email.me> <v1cjgk$1fulr$1@news1.tnib.de> <v1dutq$q8t$3@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <4ffbcb1a-6f98-328e-7854-e2a42caeca75@example.net> <v1g71v$s3s$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <k3tsgkx98l.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <v1h91a$kln$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net aNgeT5qodxSaqrxqNOwguQQlo5wyBMCiodGnM4kvjj2wY/Y8rO X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:Uf+Dm7+6IuoLCFVePacRNbrz9KU= sha256:iGr1OtKlftnf9fwa5xdSSbaQTMmxT541Kw8v/3d0FkA= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA In-Reply-To: <v1h91a$kln$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> Bytes: 3087 On 2024-05-09 03:31, Grant Taylor wrote: > On 5/8/24 13:32, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> Mmm? What is the advantage? > > It really depends on what command you do use and what the target user's > account is configured with. > > `sudo -i` starts the target user's login shell directly. So it might be > comparable to `sudo bash` if the target user's shell is bash, but will > be different if the target user doesn't have bash as their default shell. > > I have aliases `si` to `sudo -i` and `s` to `sudo`. So `si` and `s` are > shorter to type and I prefer them. > >> I also don't know about it. Why should I use it? > > I went on a bit of an embrace and extend sudo to make it streamlined for > the environments that I work in. > > I've also configured sudo on my personal systems to be able to > authenticate to sudo with my ssh key. > > I've also created a wrapper that I have in my ~/bin directory that keys > off of $0 as to what command to pass to sudo. So I have ~/bin/ifconfig > -> ~/bin/sudo.wrapper so that I can simply type `ifconfig` as my user > and it's run with sudo. It's also authenticated by my ssh key so I'm > not prompted for a password. > > I'm embracing sudo and making it work for -> do things for me in a way > that I don't even need to think about it. > > I'd have to stop and think about how much, if any, of that could be > replaced with something other than sudo. But seeing as how sudo is > standard on the Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, and AIX systems I work with, > I'm somewhat reluctant to find an alternative. Though I do try to keep > an open mind and learn about other options. Me, I use "su -" and keep a terminal open as that user. I seldom use sudo, usually in scripts. -- Cheers, Carlos.