Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<gnalmjhejoulcnj1snqjhl03gn8hclqacg@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect.
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:37:28 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <gnalmjhejoulcnj1snqjhl03gn8hclqacg@4ax.com>
References: <vjvt1r$2holo$1@dont-email.me> <7g48mj9e1lq6b2qi5pjufskcb1osrcrfpk@4ax.com> <95n8mjdo7s1dl7hrlq2rlb25tca1pll0h7@4ax.com> <mnt8mj14n85aim3r2m0rahrha75s2mvomt@4ax.com> <e8namjd22k2o9kfnsugn82kmti2m2rsovq@4ax.com> <vk4c38$3ifl6$4@dont-email.me> <a2ndmj97tmjflpvjdte7mh5rvsro3o5egu@4ax.com> <vk6r7i$4akb$4@dont-email.me> <4ubgmjdmd8rdfictqu5il3pg60ns81746b@4ax.com> <vk9lf2$nssq$4@dont-email.me> <4klimjdulc9vbb00lkgjmdkqdml2ahork9@4ax.com> <vkc49q$19n3s$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 13:37:30 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fbcb2b13b634226edbfce4d565bc1b81";
	logging-data="1947787"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/arO/6FPd1lTItYR+jP2AyhRYSxXTXgcE="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZHAA6Z7wEL69w9Leq/7DaRxHpqs=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241224-2, 12/24/2024), Outbound message
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
Bytes: 4774

On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:48:57 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On 12/23/2024 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:23:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12/22/2024 10:27 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:43:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:12:54 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/20/2024 7:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:42:58 -0500, shawn
>>>>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:45 -0500, EGK <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:31:32 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her.  Explain *that* fact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape.  ABC said he was.  They lied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of story.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't in other jurisdictions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They didnt want to go through discovery and be exposed as the biased
>>>>>>>>>> organization most of the media is.  ABC producers warned Stephanopolous not
>>>>>>>>>> to use the term "rape" and he just thumbed his nose at them and did it
>>>>>>>>>> repeatedly anyway.
>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/media/abc-parent-disney-didnt-think-it-would-beat-trump-in-court-report/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He could still likely have gotten away with it if he had said
>>>>>>>>> something like "I think he's guilty of rape" while still giving the
>>>>>>>>> official legal facts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's not forget he was verbally attacking a rape victim during the
>>>>>>>> interview.  Way to go Boy George.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, he was verbally (albeit indirectly) attacking a rapist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you see the interview?  He was extremely aggressive towards her.
>>>>>> Disgraceful behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree.  He was extremely aggressive towards her disgraceful behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What disgraceful bbehavior did she exhibit?
>>>
>>> She stonewalled his question by chanting a baseless accusation.
>>>
>> 
>> What "baseless accusation"?
>> You have this completely backwards.
>
>Well, "backwards" is certainly what she was going for.  She tried to 
>turn his question ("How can a rapee support a rapist?") into shaming 
>raped women for their "political choices".  I can't even begin...
>

Look at you blaming the (literal) victim.
You're pathetic.