Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<gnalmjhejoulcnj1snqjhl03gn8hclqacg@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect. Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:37:28 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 84 Message-ID: <gnalmjhejoulcnj1snqjhl03gn8hclqacg@4ax.com> References: <vjvt1r$2holo$1@dont-email.me> <7g48mj9e1lq6b2qi5pjufskcb1osrcrfpk@4ax.com> <95n8mjdo7s1dl7hrlq2rlb25tca1pll0h7@4ax.com> <mnt8mj14n85aim3r2m0rahrha75s2mvomt@4ax.com> <e8namjd22k2o9kfnsugn82kmti2m2rsovq@4ax.com> <vk4c38$3ifl6$4@dont-email.me> <a2ndmj97tmjflpvjdte7mh5rvsro3o5egu@4ax.com> <vk6r7i$4akb$4@dont-email.me> <4ubgmjdmd8rdfictqu5il3pg60ns81746b@4ax.com> <vk9lf2$nssq$4@dont-email.me> <4klimjdulc9vbb00lkgjmdkqdml2ahork9@4ax.com> <vkc49q$19n3s$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 13:37:30 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fbcb2b13b634226edbfce4d565bc1b81"; logging-data="1947787"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/arO/6FPd1lTItYR+jP2AyhRYSxXTXgcE=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZHAA6Z7wEL69w9Leq/7DaRxHpqs= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241224-2, 12/24/2024), Outbound message X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846 Bytes: 4774 On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:48:57 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >On 12/23/2024 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote: >> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:23:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/22/2024 10:27 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:43:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:12:54 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/20/2024 7:04 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:42:58 -0500, shawn >>>>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:45 -0500, EGK <memyself@null.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:31:32 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" >>>>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . . >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her. Explain *that* fact. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape. ABC said he was. They lied. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of story. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't in other jurisdictions. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They didnt want to go through discovery and be exposed as the biased >>>>>>>>>> organization most of the media is. ABC producers warned Stephanopolous not >>>>>>>>>> to use the term "rape" and he just thumbed his nose at them and did it >>>>>>>>>> repeatedly anyway. >>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/media/abc-parent-disney-didnt-think-it-would-beat-trump-in-court-report/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He could still likely have gotten away with it if he had said >>>>>>>>> something like "I think he's guilty of rape" while still giving the >>>>>>>>> official legal facts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let's not forget he was verbally attacking a rape victim during the >>>>>>>> interview. Way to go Boy George. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, he was verbally (albeit indirectly) attacking a rapist. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you see the interview? He was extremely aggressive towards her. >>>>>> Disgraceful behavior. >>>>> >>>>> I agree. He was extremely aggressive towards her disgraceful behavior. >>>>> >>>> >>>> What disgraceful bbehavior did she exhibit? >>> >>> She stonewalled his question by chanting a baseless accusation. >>> >> >> What "baseless accusation"? >> You have this completely backwards. > >Well, "backwards" is certainly what she was going for. She tried to >turn his question ("How can a rapee support a rapist?") into shaming >raped women for their "political choices". I can't even begin... > Look at you blaming the (literal) victim. You're pathetic.