Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<goSdnZuxgv-_iz36nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 01:04:34 +0000
From: ant@zimage.comANT (Ant)
Subject: Re: What Have You Been Playing... IN JANUARY 2025?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
References: <lrhspjltqo8598jqtg9u3gqsq3dqlu0ii5@4ax.com> <dda3b92dfee697582541f871094c63fcbff4472f@i2pn2.org> <0bgvpj9of6c2hmiqkmqrnvejgjv4tmvk1s@4ax.com>
User-Agent: tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (Linux/6.12.6-200.fc41.x86_64 (x86_64))
Message-ID: <goSdnZuxgv-_iz36nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 01:04:34 +0000
Lines: 38
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.180.143.226
X-Trace: sv3-go6SIBlohpj9WT7KvjzqtudifHKicl5LRT2/eEVddMULg2Iz4JSIUKzMejIKgK1BjNS7rkKOrvQCYQi!HlEk22GRmkdpPNUoX6TFuhIVOafoFoxtPr+anMSeXkf/kukSpdOmIzfycNq+OMO2ByuaYf4mGrNJ!aO9/nCWX5uvIsO/4SaRLvbaVj53Bb2Uw
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2946

Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote:
....
> >Book Addendum:

> Heh. Time for a "What Have You Been Reading" (or maybe a CSIPGA Movie
> Reviews" thread?

Yes, but I am not doing books. I don't even read in games. ;)


> I worked my way through seven of Ian Banks "Culture" novels. I sort of
> ran out of steam before I got to the last book ("Hydrogen Sonata").
> It's not that I don't want to read it (well, re-read) but I really
> started yearning for something different. Bank's had his own unique
> style but there's only so much of it I could take.


> (oh, and with regards to movies, Star Trek Section 13 is as bad as
> everyone is telling you. I can honestly say I enjoyed "Borderlands'
> more... and that's saying something. It's not just a bad Star Trek
> movie, it's just a bad movie all around; terrible cinematography,
> awful story, tedious pacing, unexciting sets and set-pieces. As some
> wag wrote, the only good thing you can say about Section 13 is that it
> finally put to rest the question about which is the worst Star Trek
> movie. ;-)

I was going to watch it as a Trek(ie/er), but decided not to after 
seeing all the negative reviews and ratings. Even its trailers were bad. 
I have other better things to do like play games. Wait, I don't even 
play enough games these days. :(
-- 
"Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love." --1 John 4:8. Finally, a warm (L/C)NY's wood snek weekend! A longer winter predicted by this groundant that saw his own shadow after waking up this mawny.
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
  /\___/\   Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
 / /\ /\ \                      Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o   o| |
   \ _ /
    ( )