Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Google is preparing to replace RCS with MLS
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 14:07:44 +0200
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <gp1kokxobv.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <leto4eFasrbU6@mid.individual.net>
 <v6fhmo$2t3q$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lf1u3tF4e6pU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v6hg7d$26q0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lf2vdvF9ct8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v6hint$2u54$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <ado7mkxb4o.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <v6s8ak$1v1p$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lfi1tuFi7p8U1@mid.individual.net>
 <v736m6$2a82$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lg20eeFkfqU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7goff$163n$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lg4b64FbavdU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v7j3kt$1t9s$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lg95eqF3eteU1@mid.individual.net>
 <v7op3l$c3q$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lghtbaFpls7U2@mid.individual.net> <v80fn2$2nqsm$3@dont-email.me>
 <lgi05rFpls7U6@mid.individual.net>
 <v81p3k$mhc$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lgk8tbF63ivU3@mid.individual.net>
 <v83gr9$2g47$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <lhf688F92a1U1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net iJ6CLYizCEmUvbNASypt8wRuRqruxwZSJBCIULiU3lr/Z4212Y
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VhkR5DLGEcLxmpZmaUHMCy/hUWA= sha256:PxnE55kDz+zENUWlzqnjqkAA/3nt8cPK2Rwh/4o5j9E=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To: <lhf688F92a1U1@mid.individual.net>
Bytes: 3278

On 2024-08-06 19:53, Arno Welzel wrote:
> Andrew, 2024-07-27 21:12:
> 
> [...]
>> Let's just leave it at that, as people can disagree on philosophy as long
>> as they don't disagree on the facts.
>>
>> For every thousand times you unlock your phone, I unlock mine once.
> 
> Which is no problem for me at all. Unlocking take way less than a second
> for me. It's more or less not much more hassle than just picking up the
> phone and turning it on. In fact the display already turns on as soon as
> I pick it up so the remaining action to unlock it is really quick.
> 
>> I consider my method efficient and your method inefficient.
> 
> I consider your method as not relevant for most people. Most people use
> their phones to store private data on them. And this data needs to be
> protected. And people do not only acces their data once or twice a day.

Store or access. Like accessing a banking app. Like making fast 
payments. It is a thing millions of people do pretty often.


> 
> I use my phone also for my professional job which means I some days I it
> *many* times and *alway* I *must* access protected data. Decrypting a
> encrypted container only once a day and then leaving it vulnerable for
> the whole day would not be an option.
> 
>> As long as we agree on the facts, that's all that matters.
> 
> Yes, I agree that your method is easier for you. But this does not mean
> anything.
> 

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.