Path: ...!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 21:57:49 +0000
Subject: Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <aecb6e4bd2b86ebc457767da8cc40c02@www.novabbs.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:57:27 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <aecb6e4bd2b86ebc457767da8cc40c02@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <gpSdnQefTM3Ae7b6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 31
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-E23+/4T5f8UYrwNfIgF1QVKOuf6y92y6jXEEkPaR6n5Jo9gP/KDFssvYg6pwKp9qLHY1hQGq2rjY5DU!M9w9fxXZkaj/3i/CPU8CXs84GSq/9J1B2MOlXx2xALcAVctCZW0ercHhIDAtfEZ/Zm/FVA/WT8/O
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2256

On 11/06/2024 01:50 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
> General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.
>
>
> It ditches it.
>
> According to special relativity time dilation is caused by relative
> motion per se.
>
> This has been rightly criticized as self-contradictory.
>
> General relativity says the clock that is accelerating is time dilating.
> This makes the cause absolute motion and not relative motion.
>
> Therefore, GR ditches SR, which is a distinctly different and false
> theory.

Einstein just calls it "spatial" for GR and a separate, though
concident and indifferent, 'in the limit', "spacial" for SR.

It's so though that Einstein already long ago arrived
at "SR is local" because "Relativity of Simultaneity is non-local",
according to his "the time" representing Einstein's clock hypothesis.

Of course that's not the same as "1905 SR" nor "1915 GR",
his circa 1935 "Relativity theory (motion)".

Anyways Einstein already has "GR first", though most followers
are ignorant of it.