Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<h0OEVFxSgq2gd5cmNPUgyKg6lek@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <h0OEVFxSgq2gd5cmNPUgyKg6lek@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net>
 <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <lf7ps7F1bn5U2@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: YCnDrTx7Oc6O4rGi2JUNegifhSw
JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=h0OEVFxSgq2gd5cmNPUgyKg6lek@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 24 16:25:26 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-10T16:25:26Z/8942037"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2657
Lines: 33

Le 10/07/2024 à 18:06, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> 
> Actually I have not read Langvin's paper, but a paper about Langvin's 
> paradox:
> "Langevin's twin paradox and the forwards and backwards movement of a 
> rotating cylinder experiment"
> 
> https://hal.science/hal-01003084v1
> 
> So, possibly, there is a difference between the origional and the quote.
> 
> 
>> This is where the paradox lies.
> 
> I personally think, that velocity is irrelevant for 'time-dilation', 
> while acceleration is not.
> 
> So I have problems with the 'twin paradox' per se.
> 
> TH

Everyone has problems with the Langevin paradox, since for 120 years, no 
one (except Doctor Hachel) has ever succeeded in explaining it and showing 
that the theory of special relativity well explained (and not by the 
physics teachers who teach Minkowski space-time) is simple, coherent and 
logical.
So everyone starts saying anything, explaining anything, and behaving in 
any way.
We arrive at a problem which is more of a religious nature than a 
scientific one, and it is simply incredible. “We don’t want this man 
to rule over us.”
Scientifically, what is happening is simply incredible.

R.H.