Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Some bicycle paths...
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:11:18 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <h0j4aj5g5l4hq49o71uhmh6adagrf348q0@4ax.com>
References: <OuNnO.242206$J6gc.228181@fx09.ams4> <moev9jtvq9198p73n6k53078adr05ikjb5@4ax.com> <tmhv9jl28kiomod2ht5vrbjmr6kd8u0d43@4ax.com> <v7qe8n$1liqa$4@dont-email.me> <dkk1aj5e39d0iu8sjr937fhnk1j6t6biea@4ax.com> <l1p1aj9vhplp4r2qqb2seed6dmmdvletls@4ax.com> <v7r3r1$1nug0$1@dont-email.me> <v7r6v6$1q2ff$1@dont-email.me> <cn63ajhof05ufg9beuuoksdar1uqqrj66k@4ax.com> <v7s82e$1va65$2@dont-email.me> <etc4ajp3jdeq2c6tmn73v98rq7ftuqddkm@4ax.com> <g1g4aj90e4codctdhummefsm8okc8dkt45@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:11:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4f46028e00a63770afb4a69cfcf2ba48";
	logging-data="2423195"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18s5XHn0/VWXaPAsbmVEdomKAa4bte7NPA="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1FlTWAOTLDjp8BsMaXbPj97KDPc=
Bytes: 3317

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:35:15 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:17:08 -0400, Catrike Ryder
><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:59:58 -0400, Frank Krygowski
>><frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>>The guns I argue against are absolutely designed to kill people. 
>>
>>No more than any other gun, and handguns kill far more people than the
>>guns you argue against.
>>
>>>I'm 
>>>saying their detriments to society greatly outweigh their non-existent 
>>>practical benefits.
>>
>>Apparently, nobody cares what you're saying.
>>
>>> I note that nobody here has yet posted a practical 
>>>benefit for such guns in civilian hands. And I note that you, John, 
>>>apparently do not own an AR-style rifle. That means you judge the 
>>>detriments of owning an AR-style rifle outweigh any practical benefits. 
>>
>Well, I don't own any guns at the moment but when  I was shooting I
>owned a considerable number over the years. I've, for example, owned,
>and shot, a number of muzzle loading rifles, I've owned pistols
>ranging from .22 to ,45 Colt Auto, Rifles in many sizes and I even
>built custom varmint rifles and a few custom deer rifles.
>But, no, I've never owned an AR type as I don't have any use for one
>but if I was still shooting in rifle matches I would certainly have
>several.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_power_rifle
>But I suppose he has to make up some sort of story to appear to have
>at least a small knowledge about guns, but his ignorance is such that
>his arguments prove, over and over again how little knowledge he
>really has.


Krygowski fallaciously suggests that it's wrong to argue in favor of
anything you don't own.  One of the detriments of buying a good AR15
is the price. However, if they only cost a couple hundred bucks, I'd
probably buy one, if for no other reason, just to thumb my nose at the
anti-AR15 loons.