Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize gravity?
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:44:51 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <h782uk-56be2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato>   <lqsstk-85j62.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <678b32e2a0eba553fdcf24b9489cc5d5@www.novabbs.com> <aflttk-b2682.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <06a143affa77a528480f8fb55f650787@www.novabbs.com> <o0gvtk-5gba2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <171469a06dcc0b480244123ef80cb6c7@www.novabbs.com> <76c0uk-4rvb2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <96c8579ab960aa5997554af4cd2c3f7e@www.novabbs.com> <dji0uk-s68c2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <63005891cd240fd7b358b2d7e2b6244c@www.novabbs.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:46:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3314ac6abc0b63111648c25a3ecea8d1";
	logging-data="1825119"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+h34AcEB0N+YQxGKFxZlB5"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-122-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v7jME6VePbFVNJx6YuRbKivaDqM=
Bytes: 3647

Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 22:29:35 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:40:09 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:39:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:00:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip old crap>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having watched your videos I have to ask, what is it that you think is
>>>>>>>> new in YOUR railgun in one sentence? Where is your math that shows it is
>>>>>>>> anything new?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heavy armature, very low voltage, very light weight.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing new there whatsoever.
>>>>>
>>>>> Keep on lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is a new design
>>>>>>> rail gun which proved Arindam's thesis that it has no reaction by easily
>>>>>>> reproducible experiment. Which is the greatest science discovery of our
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet you have no details, no instrumentation, no data and no analysis
>>>>>> with error bars that prove anything.  Just crackpot ravings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Keep on lying. What better to expect from racist bigots!
>>>>
>>>> Does your railgun have two parallel conductors connected to a DC power
>>>> source?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, nothing new there.
>>>
>>> Did any other railgun design work in this manner?
>>> Did any previous railgun design have manually portable low weight, low
>>> voltage, and very heavy armature?
>>>
>>> NO
>>
>> Yes.
> 
> Who did that, lying wretch?

LOTS of people crackpot.

Do a google search for DIY railgun and enjoy the thousands of hits
crackpot.

>>
>>> This PARTICULAR railgun ***design*** IS A NEW INVENTION.
>>
>> Nope.
> 
> Yes. No one did it before.

No one did WHAT before crackpot?

>>
>> The mathmatics that describes how railguns work has been known for a
>> long time.
>>
>> How is the mathmatics that describes how your railguns works any
>> different crackpot?
> 
> Penisnino that maths is beyond your scope.

You have no math, Arindam, never had, never will because you are just a
penis obsessed, arm waving crackpot.