Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<hPCcnTA3LPD80-n6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 20:04:49 +0000
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vk23m7$31l8v$1@dont-email.me>
 <bce1b27d-170c-4385-8938-36805c983c49@att.net> <vk693m$f52$2@dont-email.me>
 <a17eb8b6-7d11-4c59-b98c-b4d5de8358ca@att.net> <vk7dmb$7mh2$2@dont-email.me>
 <b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
 <vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
 <d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
 <vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa2941e93e806f1dda55d563dd062db67eb879f1@i2pn2.org>
 <vktmi3$1ia1u$1@dont-email.me>
 <c46775b30460bc564b3fe7bd1b838713829024f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vkv3t1$1qb93$1@dont-email.me>
 <2163aa0c0efba66c813e8ebda5ef5ece6d19ea34@i2pn2.org>
 <vl1901$2b0qi$1@dont-email.me>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 12:04:51 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vl1901$2b0qi$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <hPCcnTA3LPD80-n6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 57
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-qLqtdG31MKAnLw6KUzNispP7vRQ8QKwz/DZBD7iemhZBQkib8rKatgWQIMm/rkA61lypxqqw0SRQTts!IwMS54hXvwP2SQFGTApPR+OioVn+blHublRZYFRGjMISwdYXvaIGi1G+BxmUHwn9I1QTDIWrtRQ=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4111

On 12/31/2024 09:17 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> Richard Damon was thinking very hard :
>> On 12/30/24 4:38 PM, WM wrote:
>>> On 30.12.2024 17:08, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 12/30/24 3:44 AM, WM wrote:
>>>>> On 30.12.2024 01:36, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/29/24 5:31 PM, WM wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> My theorem: Every union of FISONs which stay below a certain
>>>>>>> threshold stays below that threshold.
>>>>>>> Find a counterexample. Don't claim it but prove it. Fail.
>>>>>
>>>>>> But what does that prove?
>>>>>
>>>>> That proves the existence of dark numbers.
>>>>
>>>> How?
>>>>
>>>> It shows that there are numbers you didn't look at, but you admit to
>>>> not looking at all the numbers.
>>>
>>> Neither can you look at more numbers.
>>
>> Of course I can look at "more" numbers, as I can look at the one after
>> where you stopped.
>>
>>>>
>>>>>> The finite numbers are finite, and that is it.
>>>>>
>>>>> FISONs do not grow by unioning them. All FISONs and their unions
>>>>> stay below 1 % of ℕ.
>>>
>>>>> Proof: Every FISON that is multiplied by 100 remains a FISON that
>>>>> can be multiplied by 100 without changing this property.
>>>>>
>>>>> If ℕ is an actually infinite set then it is not made by FISONs.
>>>
>>> That is what I have been telling you for a long time.
>>
>> But there is no Natural Number that isn't in a FISON, which is NOT
>> what you have been saying.
>>
>> You don't seem to understand the difference between a set and its
>> members.
>
> He has in the past explicitly stated such. Something like 'a set is
> nothing more than its elements' -- I don't think he has changed his tune.

Sets are defined by their elements,
then though all the relations of sets
are defined by all the relations of sets,
in set theory, a theory with one relation, elt.

Then there's class/set distinction, that's
another fine point ignored by all inductive bots.