Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<hk_DCVk92KA2f4DTh9J4ynzgCEw@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <hk_DCVk92KA2f4DTh9J4ynzgCEw@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Galaxies don't fly apart because their entire frame is rotating References: <3pqdnTzZ85-dG2X4nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <uub83k$1k226$1@dont-email.me> <l79nppFq93mU1@mid.individual.net> <uuoc92$191kf$1@dont-email.me> <l7k68tFdc15U1@mid.individual.net> <uv4hhn$gafg$6@dont-email.me> <l7mkn3Fo5f0U1@mid.individual.net> <Hth0_uEjY9-2dTDy92yn7g6IPl4@jntp> <1qrsve6.89zgre180uf00N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <l7pmlcF86tkU1@mid.individual.net> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: oTJlbmVsMLsSNdNkX-4-WcaQ36k JNTP-ThreadID: 3pqdnTzZ85-dG2X4nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=hk_DCVk92KA2f4DTh9J4ynzgCEw@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Thu, 11 Apr 24 11:08:00 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="76f1a39d094f7b4c073b3891075c93d999df9a42"; logging-data="2024-04-11T11:08:00Z/8813142"; posting-account="190@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <python@org.invalid> Bytes: 3283 Lines: 50 Le 11/04/2024 à 10:51, Thomas Heger a écrit : > Am 10.04.2024 um 15:30 schrieb J. J. Lodder: > >>>>> >>>>> Also, perhaps our current state of the art technology wrt observing the >>>>> universe from our little earth is damn near pre embryonic wrt the grand >>>>> scheme of things... ;^) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Usual observations from our perspective of the universe would require to >>>> remove the effects of the delay, which is caused by the finite speed of >>>> light. >>>> >>>> But this is not done. >>> >>> Of course it is done!!! >>> >>> You have definitely never read any paper about astronomy, or the history >>> of astronomy. As a matter of fact one of the main issue in astronomy is >>> to determine the distance of objects as precisely as possible. >>> >>> Thomas, why are you constantly making up stuff of that kind? Is it malice >>> or stupidity? >>> >>> Both? >> >> Hanlon's razor applies, I think. >> >> And for amusement: noting different delays of quasar fluctuations, >> in passing through an Einstein lens, is a practical way >> of establishing their cosmological distance, > > Sure, the delay is known. > > But how would you remove it? > > The difference in time is actually HUGE, hence you would need to wait a > VERY long time, if you want to know the present position of stars seen a > few billion light years away. *facepalm* Q. How to know what week day and month day will tomorrow be ? A. Wait 24 hours, then look at your phone > In the meantime cosmologists explain the positions of stars, which do > not belong to the same time. In the meantime cosmologists are not idiots, they know about physics (while you do not).