| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<hnfpsjhupvk3iuoc34c9osl5qh6ir3d91j@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: I'm Suspended from NextDoor Again Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 17:08:42 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 61 Message-ID: <hnfpsjhupvk3iuoc34c9osl5qh6ir3d91j@4ax.com> References: <vqiaqq$aioi$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 23:08:46 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="95f6c2bf66a13aa46629ae25375e8aa0"; logging-data="373670"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180GnjD66Raat0Le4zU8Lfrn7GO4KzQcEA=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:s97Yd0Qixc1+IDBkOmdlhmcKBZc= Bytes: 4024 On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 20:54:51 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >This time it was 30 days on the bench for 'cultural shaming'. I responded in a >thread about L.A.'s vagrants to someone who posted the city's official stats. >I said this: > > And how much of that alleged decrease is because > of deceptive numbers games by embarrassed > government officials? > > For example, Karen Bass’s "Inside Safe" program > provides hotel rooms (at taxpayer expense, naturally) > for vagrants. Every vagrant who takes a hotel room is > counted in the official stats as 'housed' (no longer > homeless). Even if the vagrant only stays there for > 24 hours and then goes back to the streets, Bass takes > a victory lap, claiming she housed a vagrant, even > though that vagrant is back to living under a bridge. > > The official stats on which those news reports are > based are full of accounting shenanigans just like that. > I'd sooner trust a Ferengi than I would those numbers. > >I assumed when I saw the suspension notice that it was because I was arguing >against the leftist Agenda or because I used the word 'vagrant', which is >apparently now the latest no-no slur according to the 'progressives'. I'm confused as to how they know what you wrote. I guess they asked for all your social media accounts (and you gave them that information) but then they would have to have some sort of combo of computer search on-going for any possible violations and then have a human verify that it crosses some barrier that NextDoor has established. I'm amazed that they considered that worth their time. If I were a stockholder I would question why the company cares about what customers are doing on social media. >But no, the reason given for my suspension was for 'cultural shaming and >insensitivity' due to my Ferengi remark. I laughed my ass off, thinking some >bone-headed censor at NextDoor thought 'Ferengi' was a reference to Jews (or >some other ethnicity) so I wrote back and explained it was a STAR TREK >reference and that Ferengi are a fictional race of aliens on the TV show. >There is no actual culture to shame or be insensitive towards. > >It turns out I was giving the NextDoor people too much credit for being simply >ignorant about STAR TREK. They responded and said they were aware that it was >a Trek reference but that it didn't matter. Their rules regarding cultural >insensitivity include fictional cultures in film, television, and literature >because such cultures are often allegories for human cultures in real life. > >My gob was smacked by my fully-gasted flabber. I guess I shouldn't say anything against the clones in Star Wars. > >As absurd and bizarre as the 'progressives' have become, being suspended from >a social media platform for insulting the Ferengi was not on my 2025 bingo >card. I'm sorry, but you are wrong to call these people "progressives". As that is clearly a regressive behavior that is clearly uncalled for.