| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<hoycncub1difQaP6nZ2dnZfqn_gAAAAA@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 07:06:42 +0000 Subject: Re: Uh Oh ... Newest Nvidia Chips OVERHEAT Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <kPCcnXzSs9DzI6f6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vhlroj$aj9r$1@dont-email.me> <lq7s6oFp7qgU5@mid.individual.net> From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Organization: wokiesux Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 02:06:42 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <lq7s6oFp7qgU5@mid.individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <hoycncub1difQaP6nZ2dnZfqn_gAAAAA@earthlink.com> Lines: 16 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-FgpEP6+kTrfj3MP52GhqjUbz8PaV8nwbR2vcdFqwsQqTWRv88xvbU9McTXzb8zmifj2jZ4K6Z3hPg+v!D+aXiqVh8pvjmLJbjwd2W3SOqIXcw9apFyWydSB0VUP3x6EgnY7un2WJm7h9NI9kFr0JaSmM8Rpd!W6VDUlsJp/IDnmdjLSGO X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 1946 On 11/20/24 11:45 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 07:35:47 +0800, Woozy Song wrote: > >> 1000 watts TDP? >> Seems just making more powerful chips by brute force has to end soon. > > Faster == hotter. I remember a seminar about 40 years ago when CMOS was > coming into its own and touted as low power. The dirty little secret was > the power required to switch capacitive loads is a function of the voltage > and frequency so the dynamic power dissipation exceeded that of 74LS parts > when you drove them hard. > > A lot has changed since then but I'm not waiting for a miracle. SOME "miracle" will be necessary ... we're about at the limit.