Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Report: Arm cancelling contract with Qualcomm
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:33:25 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <hvonhj1vosg6v0k85pasii8t78q2ups6cv@4ax.com>
References: <4icSO.729346$_o_3.339223@fx17.iad> <vfcp8g$2heoe$2@dont-email.me> <VCrSO.101991$S9Vb.68495@fx45.iad> <mlqmhj5qn9th3475ci1csreplan423lpj6@4ax.com> <vfgmsq$395ug$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:33:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="183e359049f87b83936f5af45b344efd";
	logging-data="3465040"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8OA5MlM371hE5u1WHwf1aeko2R3Tpepw="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C16EYuf5ECdRREBtPvkOA0LASvI=
OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2381

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

>> I wouldn't ever buy another x86 laptop, but the ARM ones are sweet.
>> Even Win11 wouldn't be so terrible on one, but I'd of course delete
>> that and put Debian on.
>
>What happened to openSuse?


Actually, I might go with openSUSE for the laptop, it wasn't as good
as Debian turned out to be for my desktop setup, but I liked it in
most ways.


>I don't use Linux much anyway, but I won't ever again try or install 
>distros with a 'code of conduct' or a DEI statement, both of which 
>Debian and Ubuntu have.


Here we go, I don't care about this shit.  I eat Chick-fil-A and
Waffle House, I just don't give a damn about their political dealings,
fuck it, a man's gotta eat and they serve up some bangin' food.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.