Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<i$oEkNCEAZinFwgU@b-howie.co.uk>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Serial, concurrent, parallel
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 23:02:28 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <i$oEkNCEAZinFwgU@b-howie.co.uk>
References: <vm69a2$2h52d$1@dont-email.me> <GmidCLItFSinFw1R@b-howie.co.uk>
 <rraiojlip0hl9vjaa742fmtq9dpmo2v2l1@4ax.com>
Reply-To: brian <brian@b-howie.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:02:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7746d4caea5aa856237fb1016f9431a3";
	logging-data="3900584"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18TPrsom1HbrTIRTNb8j9Vi"
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-S (<PkfO5kHqML+wnra4QgphryYU5J>)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6oOcFQpbnn1gpyLg1meJvKrOE/w=
Bytes: 2158

In message <rraiojlip0hl9vjaa742fmtq9dpmo2v2l1@4ax.com>, john larkin 
<JL@gct.com> writes
>On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:10:37 +0000, brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>In message <vm69a2$2h52d$1@dont-email.me>, Don Y
>><blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> writes
>>>I am surprised (disturbed?) at the problems people seem to have
>>>sorting these things out in their thought processes.  I don't
>>>*believe* people think strictly "serially" but I am beginning to
>>>question that belief as I witness smart/capable people stuck in
>>>that mindset!
>>
>>It's simple project engineering and resource management . PERT ,
>>Critical path analysis, lead times , Gantt charts, even Microsoft
>>Project if you must. You must be talking to non-engineers.
>>
>>Brian
>
>The more such management tools that you use, the slower a project will
>go.
>
>The key observation is that when things are serialized, they happen
>sequentially.
>

PERT and the  like handles parallel processing paths , in fact it almost 
forces you do it . When things are concurrent they happen in parallel .

B .
-- 
Brian Howie