| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<iASdnXtqwJPaSbr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 19:51:35 +0000 Subject: Re: What composes the mass of an electron? Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <a3b70d34ff5188e99c00b2cf098e783a@www.novabbs.com> <lolpcdFibl9U1@mid.individual.net> <672677DE.5CB2@ix.netcom.com> <lopdeqF4u40U1@mid.individual.net> <6727CF40.3F47@ix.netcom.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:51:47 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6727CF40.3F47@ix.netcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <iASdnXtqwJPaSbr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 95 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-nG0M5Icvj8onTixocavGw6Rw+FKge+PA/5Jf5JoA3vCU8ec1devM3aUFL0PlowiayAY97uQm2Uoc5De!rhHkuafqT1l6rndH5SnxRylwwvsadp+CBRnMV0+IVvvpwtuIh7SedjYteAbDTmQNt6xp0mz/zuh/ X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4181 On 11/03/2024 11:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Sylvia Else wrote: >> >> On 03-Nov-24 3:05 am, The Starmaker wrote: >>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02-Nov-24 2:13 am, rhertz wrote: >>>>> A definition of mass, as found in Google: >>>>> >>>>> "Mass is a measurement of the amount of matter or substance in an >>>>> object. >>>>> It's the total amount of protons, neutrons, and electrons in an object." >>>>> >>>>> It's "accepted" since the 60s that protons and neutrons are not >>>>> elementary particles anymore. As stated in the Standard Model of >>>>> Elementary Particles, protons and neutrons are composed of quarks, with >>>>> different flavors. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.quantumdiaries.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2000px-Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg_.jpg >>>>> >>>>> But electrons are thought as elementary particles, so they can't be >>>>> formed by a collection of other elementary particles. Even quarks are >>>>> currently thought as working together with elementary gluons (QCD, Gauge >>>>> Bossons). >>>>> >>>>> So, what is THE MATTER that electrons contain? >>>>> >>>>> This is one of many FAILS of the current SMEP. >>>>> >>>>> Is that the electron's mass is composed of unknown matter? Maybe of >>>>> electromagnetic nature? >>>>> >>>>> After all, modern civilization is based on what electrons can do, isn't >>>>> it? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> THEY KNOW NOTHING, AS IN RELATIVISM!. >>>> >>>> An expectation that everything can be explained in terms of other >>>> smaller things results in an infinite regression. It's not a rabbit hole >>>> one wants to descend into. >>>> >>>> While one can hypothesise that the electron is not elementary, so far >>>> there is nothing to suggest that it has an internal structure. Until and >>>> unless something comes along to indicate that it is not elementary, you >>>> have nothing more than empty speculation. >>>> >>>> Sylvia. >>> >>> >>> Sylvia belongs to the lemmings generation. If 'somebody nameless' says the electron does not have mass... >>> then Sylvia THINKS the electron has no mass. >> >> Where did I so much as suggest that the electron has no mass? >> >> Sylvia. > > By your own words. > > You wrote: "...so far > > "...there is nothing to suggest that it has an internal structure." > > > "...nothing to suggest that it has an internal structure." > > > nothing > empty > > Slyvia, you should have wrote: : "...there is nothing to suggest that it has NO internal structure." > > > > > But instead you said: '...there is nothing to suggest that it posses an internal structure.' > > > You are SUGGESTING the electron has NO mass. > > > > > > > > > It's kind of like a little lever in the electromagnetic, .... According to Ohm and Maxwell it's electro-motive, .... "The potential"