Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<iASdnXtqwJPaSbr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 19:51:35 +0000
Subject: Re: What composes the mass of an electron?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <a3b70d34ff5188e99c00b2cf098e783a@www.novabbs.com>
 <lolpcdFibl9U1@mid.individual.net> <672677DE.5CB2@ix.netcom.com>
 <lopdeqF4u40U1@mid.individual.net> <6727CF40.3F47@ix.netcom.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 11:51:47 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6727CF40.3F47@ix.netcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <iASdnXtqwJPaSbr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 95
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-nG0M5Icvj8onTixocavGw6Rw+FKge+PA/5Jf5JoA3vCU8ec1devM3aUFL0PlowiayAY97uQm2Uoc5De!rhHkuafqT1l6rndH5SnxRylwwvsadp+CBRnMV0+IVvvpwtuIh7SedjYteAbDTmQNt6xp0mz/zuh/
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4181

On 11/03/2024 11:30 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>
>> On 03-Nov-24 3:05 am, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 02-Nov-24 2:13 am, rhertz wrote:
>>>>> A definition of mass, as found in Google:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Mass is a measurement of the amount of matter or substance in an
>>>>> object.
>>>>> It's the total amount of protons, neutrons, and electrons in an object."
>>>>>
>>>>> It's "accepted" since the 60s that protons and neutrons are not
>>>>> elementary particles anymore. As stated in the Standard Model of
>>>>> Elementary Particles, protons and neutrons are composed of quarks, with
>>>>> different flavors.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.quantumdiaries.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2000px-Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg_.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> But electrons are thought as elementary particles, so they can't be
>>>>> formed by a collection of other elementary particles. Even quarks are
>>>>> currently thought as working together with elementary gluons (QCD, Gauge
>>>>> Bossons).
>>>>>
>>>>> So, what is THE MATTER that electrons contain?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is one of many FAILS of the current SMEP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that the electron's mass is composed of unknown matter? Maybe of
>>>>> electromagnetic nature?
>>>>>
>>>>> After all, modern civilization is based on what electrons can do, isn't
>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> THEY KNOW NOTHING, AS IN RELATIVISM!.
>>>>
>>>> An expectation that everything can be explained in terms of other
>>>> smaller things results in an infinite regression. It's not a rabbit hole
>>>> one wants to descend into.
>>>>
>>>> While one can hypothesise that the electron is not elementary, so far
>>>> there is nothing to suggest that it has an internal structure. Until and
>>>> unless something comes along to indicate that it is not elementary, you
>>>> have nothing more than empty speculation.
>>>>
>>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sylvia belongs to the lemmings generation. If 'somebody nameless' says the electron does not have mass...
>>> then Sylvia THINKS the electron has no mass.
>>
>> Where did I so much as suggest that the electron has no mass?
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> By your own words.
>
> You wrote: "...so far
>
>   "...there is nothing to suggest that it has an internal structure."
>
>
> "...nothing to suggest that it has an internal structure."
>
>
> nothing
> empty
>
> Slyvia, you should have wrote: :  "...there is nothing to suggest that it has NO internal structure."
>
>
>
>
> But instead you said: '...there is nothing to suggest that it posses an internal structure.'
>
>
> You are SUGGESTING the electron has NO mass.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

It's kind of like a little lever in the electromagnetic, ....

According to Ohm and Maxwell it's electro-motive, ....

"The potential"