| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<iEcrySmdjUxutldLqSeNnz7TW4o@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <iEcrySmdjUxutldLqSeNnz7TW4o@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Does the number of nines =?UTF-8?Q?increase=3F?= References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <v5msu8$3ena6$1@dont-email.me> <7kWvquYAIwnpmJER42BML2v7650@jntp> <v5n8c3$3gth7$1@dont-email.me> <OZWcnZ95r_FOwOL7nZ2dnZfqn_gAAAAA@giganews.com> <00273084-1629-4832-9aef-884e6573546b@att.net> <0w8cRPwD2fpiK8_6vY6kxIACQr0@jntp> <82b425fe-355e-40d4-882a-b88955179a85@att.net> <kXNOUqhVO5RJr0ZVcChFHR1GHzc@jntp> <v5s682$1k7gp$6@i2pn2.org> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: L85CEE1ceMaOYWEwFIqKb7kJYqE JNTP-ThreadID: 0JbXgoRqYUfKvvWhEBWZVJgnda4 JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=iEcrySmdjUxutldLqSeNnz7TW4o@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Mon, 01 Jul 24 16:07:22 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="25d5a506365fc8262443ce1bd287e5d0233c1bef"; logging-data="2024-07-01T16:07:22Z/8927332"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2592 Lines: 29 Le 30/06/2024 à 19:56, joes a écrit : > Am Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:51:42 +0000 schrieb WM: >> Le 30/06/2024 à 12:29, Jim Burns a écrit : > >>> The values of infinite length decimals are assigned by a different >>> method from how the values of finite length decimals are assigned. >>> 0.999... ≠ 0.99999 < 1 ... >> >> If you use only definable length, then always ℵo terms are missing. > Did you mean: /finite/ length ? Only finite length is definable. >> All finite indices guarantee finite length. > > 0.(9) is not finitely long though, so there are no „missing” terms > >> 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + ... contains ℵo terms with ℵo nines, all together >> smaller than 1. > We are not talking about the terms, but their limit, which is not reached by any of the ℵo partial sum. > which is all of them > /taken together/. Nonsense. Show any terms which taken together are larger than all singles. Regards, WM