Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<iclckjh6rmh4tsjc944ipflnjp880cqsf8@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Datasheet-flation?
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:12:11 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <iclckjh6rmh4tsjc944ipflnjp880cqsf8@4ax.com>
References: <1r3ix4d.1yypjir8hoviuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vhv4k3$27kpu$2@dont-email.me> <vhvpl2$2ar1i$5@dont-email.me> <1r3jhb1.ks7h3uj4pk00N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vi0hlb$2f52m$2@dont-email.me> <1r3kq3f.13cn5n51xsaszuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vi33un$32jfc$5@dont-email.me> <1r3mdr5.1gi0f2v19nz8a6N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <v6qbkjhhjup40e98h7dpv16u41efqvh1vs@4ax.com> <1r3ni8c.168sxgezxdj08N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:09:39 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="98c1c634dacd98d87bc8809db4dd2f65";
	logging-data="3847997"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DA1hu1oXKwVLhl3IPnHlL"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uNb7sn9lpFaK0Bjzj9sjx2GPIkg=
Bytes: 3168

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:27:12 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
(Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

>john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:51:04 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>> 
>> >Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:21:56 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> >> On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:22:22 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > [...]
>> >> >> >> the English and American "billion" was harmonised many years ago at
>> >> >> >> one thousand million so there's no confusion.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Can you give a reference for that?  I haven't found one.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Try this:
>> >> >> https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/why-are-uk-and-
>> >> >> american-billions-different
>> >> > 
>> >> > It just repeats the myth but doesn't give a reference.
>> >> 
>> >> It's not a myth. UK and US billions have been harmonized at 1,000,000,000
>> >> for as long as I can remember now. As I recall, it was just done simply
>> >> via adoption rather than any Act of Parliament or Statutory Instrument.
>> >> IIRC, I think the pressure to do so came from the finance industry.
>> >
>> >Do you have a reference that isn't just heresay?
>> 
>> You can go to BBC.com and search for stories with "billions". They
>> obviously mean 1e9.
>
>That is not evidence that the two have been harmonised, it just shows
>that BBC journalists have adopted American terminology.
>
>To harmonise two systems requires formal discussion, decision and
>documentation and neither you nor I have found any evidence of that.

Sometimes the people win.