Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<iclckjh6rmh4tsjc944ipflnjp880cqsf8@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Datasheet-flation? Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:12:11 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <iclckjh6rmh4tsjc944ipflnjp880cqsf8@4ax.com> References: <1r3ix4d.1yypjir8hoviuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vhv4k3$27kpu$2@dont-email.me> <vhvpl2$2ar1i$5@dont-email.me> <1r3jhb1.ks7h3uj4pk00N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vi0hlb$2f52m$2@dont-email.me> <1r3kq3f.13cn5n51xsaszuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vi33un$32jfc$5@dont-email.me> <1r3mdr5.1gi0f2v19nz8a6N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <v6qbkjhhjup40e98h7dpv16u41efqvh1vs@4ax.com> <1r3ni8c.168sxgezxdj08N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 00:09:39 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="98c1c634dacd98d87bc8809db4dd2f65"; logging-data="3847997"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DA1hu1oXKwVLhl3IPnHlL" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:uNb7sn9lpFaK0Bjzj9sjx2GPIkg= Bytes: 3168 On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:27:12 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:51:04 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid >> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >> >> >Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:21:56 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >> >> >> >> > Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:22:22 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > [...] >> >> >> >> the English and American "billion" was harmonised many years ago at >> >> >> >> one thousand million so there's no confusion. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Can you give a reference for that? I haven't found one. >> >> >> >> >> >> Try this: >> >> >> https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/why-are-uk-and- >> >> >> american-billions-different >> >> > >> >> > It just repeats the myth but doesn't give a reference. >> >> >> >> It's not a myth. UK and US billions have been harmonized at 1,000,000,000 >> >> for as long as I can remember now. As I recall, it was just done simply >> >> via adoption rather than any Act of Parliament or Statutory Instrument. >> >> IIRC, I think the pressure to do so came from the finance industry. >> > >> >Do you have a reference that isn't just heresay? >> >> You can go to BBC.com and search for stories with "billions". They >> obviously mean 1e9. > >That is not evidence that the two have been harmonised, it just shows >that BBC journalists have adopted American terminology. > >To harmonise two systems requires formal discussion, decision and >documentation and neither you nor I have found any evidence of that. Sometimes the people win.