Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:04:15 +0000
Subject: Re: "Took It Did You? You're Boned"
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <vpbpdi$18b8t$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <hJecnXNVEOYNtCb6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: % <pursent100@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 07:04:13 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <hJecnXNVEOYNtCb6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250223-2, 2025-2-23), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Message-ID: <ilCdnc1705pCtyb6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 271
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-Q0I44TEdOe/VMaSESE7mNUKh5Cp0nrdWf7g/4evOvI80B2j+0YTT7WMiv26rLEIMG1A2+r1EynBMu6f!Cc5zl0zWnglY8Hx/TY7QSudR7/QRmKc1OEZY7Bt5O+XFMGGCLnMP+toSOJ81qwOWD3z2uq4qka5F
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 12693

MummyChunk wrote:
>> It's not a vax wrote:
>> Took It Did You? You're Boned
>> 2025-02-20 07:00 by Karl Denninger
>> https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=252858
>>
>> As for Trump and Senators: Stop defending this **** right now you ****ing
>> ghouls.
>>
>> Yeah, its that clear you chuckle****s.
>>
>>
> https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/88bbf80e-f8c8-4355-b751-c2086e204b34/resource/ 
> 
> 73efb35c-41d9-4264-881d-15a1f76861d3/download/hlth-albertas-covid-19-pandemic- 
> 
> response-2025-01-revised-biographies.pdf
>>
>>> - Pfizer vaccine safety data from the three-month post-authorization
>>> trial was alarming.
>>> - 1,223 deaths attributed to the vaccine.
>>> - 42,086 people injured within 4 days of vaccination.
>>> - 45% of these were between the ages of 18-50 (who were at negligible
>>> risk from COVID-19 infection).
>>>
>>> page 189
>>
>> I warned people about the history of this technology before it was rolled
>> out in 2020 because it was not new technology and the prior science on 
>> it,
>> along with results, was available to anyone who cared to look.  mRNA had
>> repeatedly failed on safety for cancer, where we tolerate ridiculously 
>> high
>> risk.  Very, very high risks are acceptable when you're going to die with
>> scientific certainty if you do nothing and that, by the way, is the 
>> reason
>> that drug companies target this condition: Not only is certain death a
>> motivator for someone to spend (or demand someone else spend) an 
>> unlimited
>> amount of money but in addition ridiculous levels of risk no healthy 
>> person
>> would EVER take are reasonable when you are literally staring at Brother
>> Grim with his scythe pointed at your neck.
>>
>> Oh it gets better.... well, ok, it gets worse for you. You see, the paper
>> claiming HCQ was killing people -- which was used as part of  
>> retrospective
>> justification for the EUAs -- was retracted.
>>
>>
> https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/those-published-17000-h 
> 
> ydroxychloroquine-deaths-never-happened
>>
>> That's right, it was a lie.  I pointed this out and so did Henry Ford
>> Hospital System in Michigan during the first months since they were 
>> using it
>> and had ZERO such incidents; if it was anywhere near as dangerous as 
>> claimed
>> the bodies would have hit the floor in size from it and they clearly did
>> not, never mind the million or so people using it off-label daily for 
>> Lupus
>> over the previous decades.....
>>
>> But now we have the cherry on top of the sundae which, while a 
>> preprint at
>> this point, is sourced out of Yale by some very high-powered people.
>>
>> https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.02.18.25322379v1.full.pdf
>>
>> Let me just cite the findings and dig in a tiny little bit because 
>> this is
>> the worst possible thing you could find.
>>
>>> To explore potential pathobiological features associated with PVS, we
>>> conducted a decentralized, cross46 sectional study involving VS
>>> participants and 22 healthy controls enrolled in the Yale LISTEN study.
>>> Compared with controls, PVS participants exhibited  differences in 
>>> immune
>>> profiles, including reduced circulating memory and effector CD4 T cells
>>> (type 1 and type 2) and an increase in TNFα+ CD8 T cells. PVS 
>>> participants
>>> also had lower anti-spike antibody titers, primarily due to fewer 
>>> vaccine
>>> doses.
>>
>> They of course repeat in the first line the absolute lie that the shots
>> "prevented millions of deaths"; there is no evidence for this
> whatsoever.
>> In fact we know that the shots in fact potentiate transmission to other
>> people and thus are beyond stupid and into the realm of Typhoid Mary
>> screwing every man she could find on a deliberate basis to spread 
>> disease,
>> but I'm sure that sentence has to be put in there in order to get the 
>> study
>> into the preprint server and ultimately published at all, despite its
>> blatant falsity.
>>
>> No, its here where you ought to be have your hair standing straight up if
>> you took these shots:
>>
>>> Secondly, it has been shown that the S protein expressed following
>>> BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination circulates in the plasma as early 
>>> as one
>>> day after vaccination16,17
>>
>> Wait.... what?  Oh, that admission?  You know, the one we were all told
>> didn't happen at all?  Yes, the Spike stayed in the muscle, remember?  
>> And
>> what did the Salk paper document prior to the rollout?
>>
>> Do you remember?
>>
>> The spike, alone absent the rest of the virus, does direct physiological
>> damage to the endothelium of blood vessels.
>>
>> We were all told that didn't get into the circulation (the plasma is 
>> part of
>> your blood, of course.)  Now its admitted that was a lie, quite 
>> quietly but
>> admitted nonetheless.  In other words what I pointed out before the shots
>> were rolled out -- that everyone who took even one of them was going 
>> to take
>> cardiovascular damage which I remind you is PERMANENT -- is now 
>> admitted to
>> be true.
>>
>> While the amount of damage is of course highly-variable from
>> person-to-person every single person who took even one shot did take some
>> amount of damage and the more shots you take the more damage you accrue.
>>
>> I wish that was all the bad news in that paper.
>>
>> It isn't.
>>
>> In fact its nowhere the worst part of the news.
>>
>>> To further investigate prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infections, plasma
>>> specimens were analyzed using the EUA-cleared Elecsys® anti-SARS-CoV-2
>>> immunoassays, which measure the presence of high affinity IgM, IgA, and
>>> IgG anti-N antibodies.
>>
>> Good.  They spent the money (and it wasn't cheap) to be certain what they
>> found was not from Covid infections, whether "silent"
> (asymptomatic) or
>> otherwise.  Yes, you can determine that along with whether the 
>> infection, if
>> it occurred, is current, recent or in the past.  They did and thus 
>> were able
>> to eliminate the virus itself as the cause.
>>
>>> Significant differences in subsets of circulating immune cell 
>>> populations
>>> were observed across T cell lineages. Upon assessment of the T cell
>>> populations, notably higher proportions of effector memory CD4 T cell
>>> subsets (CD4+Tem; CD45RA-/CD127+/CCR7- ; p= 0.01) and resting natural 
>>> CD4+
>>> Treg; CD45RA+/CD25+/CD127-/HLA-DR- ; p= 0.05) were observed among the
>>> controls (Figure 2D). However, the PVS cohort had significantly higher
>>> proportions of exhausted CD8 T cell (CD8+ Tex; PD-1+/TIM3+ 210 ; p=0.02)
>>> (Figure 2F) with no observed differences in the CD4+ central memory 
>>> (CD4+
>>> cm;CD45RA-/CD127+/CCR7-) and exhausted (CD4+Tex; PD-1+/TIM3+ 212 ) CD4 T
>>> cell populations (Figure 2D).
>>
>> Oh oh.  Let me translate: Those who got hit by this are immune 
>> impaired as a
>> direct consequence of taking the shots.  Those people's immune system 
>> cells
>> are degraded exactly as occurs in AIDS.  This is not caused by HIV, of
>> course (since they don't have that) but the impairment is essentially the
>> same, albeit -- at this point -- less-severe.
>>
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========