Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ir9bfj5m23ed2dtu5rpbnkhb1148me1d84@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Extensive article on Rivendell and Grant Petersen Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:32:04 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <ir9bfj5m23ed2dtu5rpbnkhb1148me1d84@4ax.com> References: <vcuvih$39ji0$4@dont-email.me> <oq26fjpl0hc62vq4jpe50htdoavd26mcgu@4ax.com> <vcvr4o$3hhf0$1@dont-email.me> <pnQIO.1160654$grz1.912786@fx03.ams4> <msl7fjljviv2kgo3p13hsffga55kjdpsfp@4ax.com> <vd13nq$3mkcm$5@dont-email.me> <uq68fjt7hfqgk22pktl6vmrq53ant1mfr3@4ax.com> <vd1afb$3nokv$1@dont-email.me> <vd1pfq$3q55o$5@dont-email.me> <k509fj18g9les74eouvh1q8h4vampm3mnj@4ax.com> <vd2hn0$1eb5$1@dont-email.me> <l86afjp1ue7gg9bapef0svfmm745tmqn99@4ax.com> <vd47hu$anap$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:32:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="11768548f7dafd5eebe26fe22a4ff44d"; logging-data="362910"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/C28WaTXFGo+I3cn8T1H73ULUhllQf3dU=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:LCCqWZQANMwTk8shuWtpsTrlbl4= Bytes: 2563 On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:01:33 -0400, Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >On 9/26/2024 4:33 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 22:42:40 -0400, Frank Krygowski >> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >>> On 9/25/2024 5:30 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote: >>>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:49:13 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>> He volunteered the numbers in an attempt to brag. Now that they've been >>>>> shown to be impossible (i.e. a lie) he's claiming technical accuracy has >>>>> no value. >>>> >>>> I've seen nothing that proves it's impossible. >>> >>> Rather, you've _understood_ nothing that proves its impossible. You're >>> determined to remain ignorant to cling to your fantasy of correctness. >> >> I make no claims of correctness. > >IOW, you posted your bragging claim about your impossibly short stopping >distance. But you now don't claim it's correct. > >We'll remember that your claims are worthless. I opined. I believe I said "probably." Opinions don't assume correctness, except to one's self. Remember that an opnion is a subjective evaluation. -- C'est bon Soloman