Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<izveVGifGDRSbakah8W7iAULn6o@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <izveVGifGDRSbakah8W7iAULn6o@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <43e0a1be4a7921eb043acb58d1168ee1@www.novabbs.com> <Kaxl44IyggMeO7Ao3IslDanrquQ@jntp> <1b0910c819bb031839b21557a19c75be@www.novabbs.com> <_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp> <1f081cbe82f7c86f1463b0bf5ad957a9@www.novabbs.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: btWMfbN6qcN9AamCwquy_pfoBYs JNTP-ThreadID: XgGFOrcTXd5ZDEX07aa-LTy0U04 JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=izveVGifGDRSbakah8W7iAULn6o@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Mon, 15 Jul 24 17:01:07 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-15T17:01:07Z/8949564"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> Bytes: 2233 Lines: 21 Le 15/07/2024 à 18:12, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:55:23 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote: > "Universal simultaneity" IS Newtonian physics. Your sentence is false by omission. Can I take the liberty of correcting it? You have to say : "Universal simultaneity IS Newtonian physics and IS Einsteinian physics". You are, once again, confusing the notion of universal simultaneity (which speaks of moments, of the same present moment) with chronotropy which measures durations, that is to say the speed at which watches beat. It's not the same thing. This confusion is surreal. It's like a nine-year-old confusing addition with multiplication. It's not the same concept at all. R.H.