| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<j1U2nPNWibMcBvZS4xE1nxnBJ10@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <j1U2nPNWibMcBvZS4xE1nxnBJ10@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: S paceTime References: <67A0465F.1394@ix.netcom.com> <67A1AAC0.624F@ix.netcom.com> <67A9AB1B.71B8@ix.netcom.com> <67AB1CF3.F7F@ix.netcom.com> <67AB8F77.3FF9@ix.netcom.com> <67AB97E4.629F@ix.netcom.com> <67AB9DF2.1A88@ix.netcom.com> <67ABA607.5170@ix.netcom.com> <67AED1F5.1CEC@ix.netcom.com> <vommfr$6v2n$1@solani.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics JNTP-HashClient: 17O2Ub2hi6xUDq67JPQtGpM1xrs JNTP-ThreadID: 67A0465F.1394@ix.netcom.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=j1U2nPNWibMcBvZS4xE1nxnBJ10@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Fri, 14 Feb 25 16:13:36 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-02-14T16:13:36Z/9208866"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> Bytes: 2467 Lines: 23 Le 14/02/2025 à 07:05, Physfitfreak a écrit : > On 2/13/25 11:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> Do I make myself clear? Not really. What must be understood is that the theory of relativity is basically true, but so misunderstood and poorly taught that it all becomes appalling. This poses two problems; one which is benign, and which is the writing of a whole new theory to be rewritten, or rather to be corrected. A theory capable of explaining things with extraordinary simplicity. Someone who has read Doctor Richard Hachel, helped by artificial intelligence can easily, very easily do it. The other is immense, colossal, and goes beyond the scientific framework to enter the psychological or even theological framework. "Certainly, it is magnificent, no one has understood RR better than him, and no one has taught it as clearly as he. But we do not want this man to reign over us". The die is cast. R.H.