Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<j1U2nPNWibMcBvZS4xE1nxnBJ10@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <j1U2nPNWibMcBvZS4xE1nxnBJ10@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: S paceTime
References: <67A0465F.1394@ix.netcom.com> <67A1AAC0.624F@ix.netcom.com> <67A9AB1B.71B8@ix.netcom.com> <67AB1CF3.F7F@ix.netcom.com>
 <67AB8F77.3FF9@ix.netcom.com> <67AB97E4.629F@ix.netcom.com> <67AB9DF2.1A88@ix.netcom.com> <67ABA607.5170@ix.netcom.com>
 <67AED1F5.1CEC@ix.netcom.com> <vommfr$6v2n$1@solani.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
JNTP-HashClient: 17O2Ub2hi6xUDq67JPQtGpM1xrs
JNTP-ThreadID: 67A0465F.1394@ix.netcom.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=j1U2nPNWibMcBvZS4xE1nxnBJ10@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 25 16:13:36 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-02-14T16:13:36Z/9208866"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2467
Lines: 23

Le 14/02/2025 à 07:05, Physfitfreak a écrit :
> On 2/13/25 11:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

>> Do I make myself clear?

Not really.

What must be understood is that the theory of relativity is basically 
true, but so misunderstood and poorly taught that it all becomes 
appalling.
This poses two problems; one which is benign, and which is the writing of 
a whole new theory to be rewritten, or rather to be corrected.
A theory capable of explaining things with extraordinary simplicity.
Someone who has read Doctor Richard Hachel, helped by artificial 
intelligence can easily, very easily do it.
The other is immense, colossal, and goes beyond the scientific framework 
to enter the psychological or even theological framework.
"Certainly, it is magnificent, no one has understood RR better than him, 
and no one has taught it as clearly as he. But we do not want this man to 
reign over us".

The die is cast.

R.H.