Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Montana: "Let's make stupidity mandatory!"
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 07:08:20 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <j3hkojpqj79lvt5currqtmhpt9212p11qi@4ax.com>
References: <7ORhP.796214$DYF8.668936@fx14.iad> <c71gojd4tdvlc125jqm3lvk53a22rs62hk@4ax.com> <vm944i$33bk6$1@dont-email.me> <vm9g32$35ll5$2@dont-email.me> <vm9h7s$35fip$2@dont-email.me> <vm9qro$371vt$6@dont-email.me> <tukhojt3bougsect96vpr4u9mtdenjg3nt@4ax.com> <vmb4rv$3hj9k$3@dont-email.me> <09ejoj5tvqbt9d4n6l7ca3u099939m87t4@4ax.com> <cstjojtod9g7i28prv9dlr1u265f50r9te@4ax.com> <am5koj1n947iv2bn9jf9u9ki6t3rh2504q@4ax.com> <dmdkojp564e33etv5ct806h3sc9uulcg8b@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:08:23 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5fe08273d60f0a9d3253271ad85ae756";
	logging-data="53844"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+MDiKu9V4HWzHHVmzeQV/Tjp1nO04Hyzg="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hV+esPXZdVd30kh/Srdry3oJXwU=
Bytes: 4040

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:02:49 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 03:37:49 -0500, Catrike Ryder
><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 22:53:38 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:01:19 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>As I've said, the best way to win an election is to say, "When elected
>>>>I will give you...."
>>>>(Or, I'll make America Great again :-)
>>>
>>>That doesn't really work.  The presidential election is decided by the
>>>electoral college, not the popular vote.  Swaying the GUM (great
>>>unwashed masses) might work in a state that bases its electoral
>>>college vote on its popular vote.  However, the real action is in the
>>>"swing" states, where the electoral vote might be almost equally
>>>divided between two candidates and where "swinging" the vote will give
>>>one candidate ALL the electoral votes for that state.
>>>
>>>Most of the election corruption I've seen was intended to be effective
>>>at the local (city and county) levels.  There may have been some at
>>>the state and federal level, but I didn't see those.  For example, one
>>>local election ended up with more votes being cast than there were
>>>eligible voters.  The same county managed to inflate the number of
>>>apartments in the larger apartment buildings and provide long lists of
>>>phantom registered voters.  Using the voter registration lists of the
>>>time, I drove to a likely apartment building and compared the list
>>>with reality, which produced a large discrepancy.  
>>
>>IMO, the winners in most competive events are decided by who can best
>>bend the rules without breaking them and getting caught. It'd be
>>interesting if in Formula One racing, the drivers for each car was
>>chosen by random the list of drivers. I suspect that the results
>>wouldn't vary too much from the actual results.
>
> When you say "most completive events" you are taking a pretty big
>bite.
>Say marathon running, for example, or pole vaulting, (:-) or even a
>spelling bee,  no online stuff, just stand up in front of everyone and
>show them how to do it (:-)

A woman I dated a few times during one of my unmarried periods was a
sprinter. She told me that her college coach had sound and video of
track and field referees starting sequence so they could practice
timing their start for the starting ref at the upcoming event.

Additional information:

That gal had great legs, but she got seasick

--
C'est bon
Soloman