Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: EGK <memyself@null.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=91Buffy_The_Vampire_?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Slayer=92_Reboot_Star?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ring_Sarah_Michelle?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_Gellar_Nears_Hulu_?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pilot_Order_With_Ch?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?lo=E9_Zhao_Directing_?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_By_Nellie_Andreeva?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_February_3,_2025_1?=
 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?2:30pm?=
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 10:18:43 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <j8b4qjhj0qi3cr917qt9nml7vfdand0m03@4ax.com>
References: <1554801279.760326364.358919.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <vns8kh$1npde$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2662872"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="t5j24esmUMAeNKrBT1bF6NEA8kaoCW+QYHu1+uqLdSA";
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4016
Lines: 57

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 05:29:53 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

>On Feb 3, 2025 at 5:49:47 PM PST, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> https://deadline.com/2025/02/buffy-the-vampire-slayer-reboot-sarah-michelle-gellar-hulu-pilot-chloe-zhao-1236273767/
>> 
>> BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER Reboot Starring Sarah Michelle Gellar Nears Hulu
>> Pilot Order with Chlo� Zhao Directing
>> 
>> More than two decades after BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER ended its seven-season
>> run, the beloved supernatural drama is eyeing a revival with a new chapter
>> in the franchise. A followup series is nearing a pilot order from Hulu,
>> with Sarah Michelle Gellar expected to star, reprising her signature role
>> as Buffy Summers
>
>Is this going to be a geriatric Buffy trying to run around and do all the
>gymnastics and whatnot that she used to as a teenager, or is she going to be
>kind of a Watcher type, mentoring a new young Slayer?
>
>> Beyond the pilot order, I hear the reboot is starting a writers room soon,
>> a sign that Hulu and the studios have high expectations for the project
>> going to series. It is unclear yet whether other original Buffy cast
>> members would return; that is considered likely.
>
>It's considered likely probably because most of them have nothing else going
>on with their careers.
>
>> Buffy creator Joss Whedon, who also wrote the 1992 movie the series was
>> based on, has no involvement in the reboot. He has not worked in Hollywood
>> in any official capacity since facing a slew of misconduct allegations in
>> 2021.
>
>Whether he was a cad or not, his writing is what made the show what it was. I
>don't have high hopes it will recapture the magic without him.

Depends on whether they can get other writers from the show, minus Marti
Noxious.

>> If the Hulu pilot goes to series, it would be the third in the franchise,
>> following mothership Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which aired on the WB for
>> five seasons from 1997-2001 before dramatically moving to UPN for two more
>
>Why was the move to UPN 'dramatic'?

I dont know how dramatic it was but, at the time, a lot of places didn't
even have a UPN affiliate.  I had none on cable here in NY state.  I don't
know if you remember him from the buffy group but George Gavalos (I think
that was it) sent me vhs tapes of episodes for a while because I was active
in that newsgroup.   I later learned about piracy from the buffy binaries
group. :D
I never watched Star Trek Enterprise because of the lack of UPN and once I
was spoiled on the ending, I never watched it later.

I'd probably watch a reboot but i'm one of those fans who felt the show went
downhill in later seasons due to choices they made.  (spike, cough, spike)
Nothing can really repeat the "High school is hell(mouth)" metaphor from the
first three years.