Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <jQ-fRzDhOf-dXQCBcSwNeS7bm6U@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <cec0225a1e6ec21e1bca57b37fff99612e4505c4@i2pn2.org>
 <8G0IFYrPqHdBEH1pzbz9ifVRvd0@jntp> <11698e94cb8361b62f1686b64d6351a9720d4d3d@i2pn2.org>
 <nhZZyv1rDmL90pLuaDma-8md3qw@jntp> <1b259a91952c93a56ad1e0063a2d7440aed185f2@i2pn2.org>
 <rHIaB-dFODVqSY7-aRnf4ItTyG0@jntp> <36aabaae939b651d51ae9dfba57c1f4a3c032447@i2pn2.org>
 <SYjKjdOLonJDxelTnBkxOxmRO7Y@jntp> <19e0a92b-4bb8-463d-8e21-dd1a829deb91@att.net>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: VD0o_JJ391xxHsMxFUsHLU8pBLo
JNTP-ThreadID: KFm3f7lT2HjaTSiMfnv5xqZoSBw
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=jQ-fRzDhOf-dXQCBcSwNeS7bm6U@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 24 11:40:18 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-08-02T11:40:18Z/8972898"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Bytes: 1975
Lines: 12

Le 01/08/2024 à 18:43, Jim Burns a écrit :
> On 8/1/2024 8:02 AM, WM wrote:

>> It is not a contradiction to my formula
>> if some n has no n+1.
> 
> No, it literally contradicts your formula
> for some n e N to not.have n+1

My formula is explicitly valid only for natural numbers. 

Regards, WM