Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 12:41:13 +0000
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 07:41:13 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly emulated
 by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own ,"return" instruction
Newsgroups: comp.theory
References: <v8o47a$3ml4$1@dont-email.me>
 <0ec454016dab6f6d6dd5580f5d0eea49569293d8@i2pn2.org>
 <v8oigl$6kik$1@dont-email.me>
 <6ec9812649b0f4a042edd1e9a1c14b93e7b9a16b@i2pn2.org>
 <v8ol2g$74lk$1@dont-email.me>
 <476303ac27d94a26dd563468f0ce10407e60034c@i2pn2.org>
 <v8oqfc$8767$1@dont-email.me>
 <ce9b3873fa013760b85c7f73e59456b6f2f0edbe@i2pn2.org>
 <v8otj0$8oip$1@dont-email.me>
 <5ea40e29a4d8e4014f485fdfda743b95148a961a@i2pn2.org>
 <v8ouh4$905l$1@dont-email.me>
 <7f796739dcafa335aff88a52af5e458d1253625b@i2pn2.org>
 <v8p10u$9ebu$1@dont-email.me>
 <de071bb436f1e79bc9645b5abbb1bea182d9f3e0@i2pn2.org>
 <v8p36o$9pm8$1@dont-email.me>
 <35c5358982b75ccc36bc041f980dd152f1b5c6a3@i2pn2.org>
 <v8p8le$aj5a$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff44c6626923661554540bf75cb50a4921a50381@i2pn2.org>
 <v8peiv$fgqd$1@dont-email.me>
 <569060964dc985138884a3bdff8d0157a52af40e@i2pn2.org>
 <v8pil5$g6tu$2@dont-email.me>
 <19eca01abd992432a5b58232c1dbb6506fa53e44@i2pn2.org>
 <4ae7f93adfcbe33c589ded0288f4e38c97d503fa.camel@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ae7f93adfcbe33c589ded0288f4e38c97d503fa.camel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <jfWdnRzxHen0VS37nZ2dnZfqlJwAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 82
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-JiLSbVzx9J4aMqpl2tjWvVPuM73eUveAHMHSkBUDzs+/vRtdry1FRsQu/qphi4uRiNo29KW+psqIBUs!BCeWo2CLx9ZzsNb1kVhE66qEEkJGNaK4L7ToII8MdknOcmVm8QpwX+deTlaQJmARn1bhIOURMGo=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4630

On 8/5/2024 6:53 AM, wij wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-08-05 at 07:40 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 8/4/24 11:58 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 8/4/2024 10:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 8/4/24 10:49 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 8/4/2024 9:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/4/24 9:07 PM, olcott wrote:>>
>>>>>>> void DDD()
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>     HHH(DDD);
>>>>>>>     return;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You still seem too dishonest to admit that DDD correctly
>>>>>>> emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its own "return"
>>>>>>> instruction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I admit that *IF* HHH does correctly (and thus completely
>>>>>> without aborting) emulated its input, then THAT DDD and ONLY that
>>>>>> DDD will be non-halting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> See there?
>>>>>
>>>>> DDD correctly emulated by any HHH that can possibly exist
>>>>> cannot possibly reach its "return" instruction and every
>>>>> C expert knows this.
>>>>
>>>> But that only apply to the PROGRAM DDD built from an HHH that never
>>>> aborts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No it does not and every C expert knows that it does not.
>>>
>>
>> Really> You have a source for that?
>>
>> Or is this just another of your "Digonalization" logic claims that you
>> retracted.
>>
>> Claims that "every x knows" are just a fallacy, and you should know it,
>> but are, of course, just to dumb to understand.
>>
>> Here the problem is you just lie about what "Correctly Emulated" means
>> for determining the behavior of a program.
>>
>> Sorry, you are just proving you are a stupid pathetic ignorant
>> pathological lying idiot with a reckless disregrad for the truth because
>> you beleive your own lies to the point that you don't even look at the
>> facts.
> 
> Don't know why I am glad to see someone finally to find out olcott is a
> "pathological liar and idiot".
> 
> Save all your time. olcott don't understand the basic "if" logic, that says
> everything to me. He don't know anything logic.
> 

typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

int main()
{
   HHH(DDD);
}

Every expert in the C programming language knows that
DDD correctly simulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "return" instruction halt state.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott

"Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
  Genius hits a target no one else can see."
  Arthur Schopenhauer