Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <181a583f1cd5cda6$86779$1316151$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <3zLm3mDTMPtyf6dcZJW5ew_XWEA@jntp> <181a5e0c344e8261$86735$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <XWiXX89pvAx66mKmIVZPwgwnfD8@jntp> <181a5eb81e767dc4$86737$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <HPF6j-4BEHrZMeoOSNYRAHyP3Tw@jntp> <181a6036c3d29170$90809$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <K1sjSIRidGRyhD2K8Ndavvy6DFs@jntp> <181a63878c3a598f$86738$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: _EDXadx3ONwapmDoNQtfuXf1F9Y
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 25 10:23:13 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="cdcf91e3472b50c760e8dcbe4a2750ed9830a543"; logging-data="2025-01-14T10:23:13Z/9174313"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 4953
Lines: 93

Le 14/01/2025 à 00:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 23:14, Python pisze:
>> Le 13/01/2025 à 23:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:58, Python pisze:
>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:45, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:40, Python pisze:
>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:33, Demented maniac, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:50, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 20:47, Idiotic kook Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:31, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>> Einstein deserved the Nobel Prize for *numerous* reasons:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
>>>>>>>>> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
>>>>>>>>> would be, and he has written it clearly
>>>>>>>>> enough for anyone able to read 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even you admitted that Poincaré would likely have kicked you in 
>>>>>>>> the a** 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wozniak.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, I didn't. A lie as usual.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You did. Amnesia now?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I didn't As you insist - maybe it's
>>>>> rather a delusion than a lie. Woll, both
>>>>> very possible.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway you did.
>>>
>>> Nope. As said - either a lie or a delusion.
>>> Both typical for a relativistic idiot in general
>>> and for you especially.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> See,  - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
>>>>>>> guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is nothing to do as you've never done anything like.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I did, I've pointed directly 2 denying
>>>>> themself predictions of his,  physics.
>>>>
>>>> You didn't, they're laughable nonsense.
>>>
>>> Of course they are, they're consequences
>>> of the physics of your idiot guru.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Only you were screaming. You got precise refutations of you silly 
>>>
>>> Nope, I've got some utterly ridiculous
>>> assertions, extremly stupid even considering
>>> the usual level of the Shit's worshippers.
>>> Well,  nothing more was ever expected, of
>>> course. It's changing nothing, the mumble
>>> of your idiot guru was not even consistent,
>>> it's been proven and a fanatic piece of shit
>>> screaming "NOOOOO!!!" spitting and slandering is
>>> changing nothing. Sorry.
>> 
>> If it were a proof how come nobody but you recognizes it as such?
> 
> Nobody is expecting a bunch of
> fanatic idiots to recognize and accept
> a proof that their divine guru was just
> a mumbling crazie.
> Expecting something like that from
> a bunch of brainwashed fanatics wouldn't
> be wise, would it?

A proof is a human production, right? As long as an alleged one is not 
considered valid by a significant community outside of its author it is 
not a proof.

There are not a single person on Earth, so far, that has publicly 
considered your "work" as a valid proof, right? As far as I can say ALL 
people who have expressed a judgement on your "work" consider it as 
completely asinine.

You can insult people, it doesn't change the fact that what you have 
nothing like a proof. Not even remotely. You don't even try seriously to 
convince people.