Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Palemoon Browser: FOSS LOSS (was: Palemoon Browser: FOSS Victory)
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 06:04:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <jo7jui1rska1mvjqn4ao0k29bfddc2mdmr@4ax.com>
References: <17ba4bc57c168176$71225$1340741$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <ubKcnfTEEIW_Y3X4nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@supernews.com> <usb88i$njot$2@dont-email.me> <17ba7102ecf3a635$1499$3078224$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0f363322074b900d9fc7f4488cf4265f";
	logging-data="1073617"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/SCMjtQdioyhEhnvA/qja3hb3eWS14oJc="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LHw0KTaD6WjDU59irMtUll9Q7F8=
OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2578

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 02:20:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
>> To be fair, that could be more of an issue with how much JS is
>> used nowadays.
>
>That's the only issue.  The web site, and not the browser,
>is at fault.
>
>I used to do my Kroger grocery shopping with Palemoon, but
>Kroger changed their web site design and now Palemoon no
>longer works.  The same happened with on-line banking.
>
>The commercial web is experiencing a sickening race to
>the bottom.
>
>But I seldom partake of the commercial web.  Palemoon works
>very well with the traditional informational web sites.
>
>Any site that does not work with Palemoon is a site that
>is not worth visiting.


So, the browser isn't up to date, and it's the Web sites' fault for
expecting it to be.  Great advocacy of Linux, dude.  I'm sure a
million new users are ready to install it, thanks to you.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.