Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<jwv8r26gtzv.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Another security vulnerability Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 12:26:30 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <jwv8r26gtzv.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> References: <utpoi2$b6to$1@dont-email.me> <utq715$jsuq$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:28:50 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="82d1b87aaa7ddf8bd39513734b9ac6f6"; logging-data="1263436"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18h5tjkqur0Vh8GypJeeEU13a8FCGVu/0Q=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5YRGtTRFdNHxgNoY+RaKmiw/scU= sha1:ZDy0arsHp5NzdB4PuMB1Sg0QCKM= Bytes: 1476 >> So, is there a way to fix this while maintaining the feature's >> performance advantage? > Even if it’s fixed, how does that help existing users with broken > machines? Of course, the current computing world loves it even more if it pushes users to buy new machines. This said, until now manufacturers don't seem to consider side-channel attacks as something worth spending much effort to avoid, so I'd expect future machines to be just as vulnerable :-( Stefan