Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <jwva5jodhdp.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<jwva5jodhdp.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Privilege Levels Below User
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:56:16 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <jwva5jodhdp.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
References: <jai66jd4ih4ejmek0abnl4gvg5td4obsqg@4ax.com>
	<h0ib6j576v8o37qu1ojrsmeb5o88f29upe@4ax.com>
	<2024Jun9.185245@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
	<38ob6jl9sl3ceb0qugaf26cbv8lk7hmdil@4ax.com>
	<2024Jun10.091648@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
	<o32f6jlq2qpi9s1u8giq521vv40uqrkiod@4ax.com>
	<3a691dbdc80ebcc98d69c3a234f4135b@www.novabbs.org>
	<k58h6jlvp9rl13br6v1t24t47t4t2brfiv@4ax.com>
	<5a27391589243e11b610b14c3015ec09@www.novabbs.org>
	<v4cpn6$1phq4$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:56:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a7718b9e88ab33048a514445d1aeb032";
	logging-data="2439124"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ScSXerVjxAk6w/lu2KY4xecn/qoK7v0U="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tux8DJ5mXvdcEDwxqo6Ev3mIVf0=
	sha1:VfQ435NF173jn5l2w3aAbzpme/Q=
Bytes: 2030

> Rowhammer can modify nearby lines, not just the ones that are being
> hammered, right? How do you guarantee that all neighbors will also
> be refreshed?

I don't know the answer to this one.

> Similarly, if the accesses are LOCK XADD operations, and you have multiple
> CPUs (or cores not sharing a common last level cache, then I don't see any
> way to avoid those accesses from making it all the way to the RAM chips?

But I can answer that one: don't!
I.e. the DRAM is attached to one and only one CPU.  Any other CPU that
wants to access that DRAM has to do it through that DRAM's CPU, which
will make it pass through its shared "last level" cache.


        Stefan