Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: OoO execution
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:45:20 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <jwvo6tjbyrt.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
References: <100apst$hsll$1@dont-email.me>
	<afa210f16ab3d6795c61787ad914e7ba@www.novabbs.org>
	<100bs7t$rna2$1@dont-email.me> <20250518182303.00003542@yahoo.com>
	<76948d869e78f8cb511809bd159008fd@www.novabbs.com>
	<100e352$1d61i$3@dont-email.me>
	<e5fc3f66c40e74c1cf09ba5ed5a53c14@www.novabbs.com>
	<2025May19.082242@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
	<8cbd51d6e62b575d9c2bf6b8cfa684af@www.novabbs.com>
	<100g2s6$1pp8t$1@dont-email.me> <1058cru$p1jc$1@dont-email.me>
	<fdad5be0cc95975649e78c284dc6f759@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 23:45:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1a14ecbc9b071f10f9410f940f34ee8e";
	logging-data="991375"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+I8EkBiiUbLTy42DQCrXOqd5SZVup/oQU="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hrxunqvXfGMIVH3M44Wqnj3fYMY=
	sha1:pSNF+MVr7Kva6TTUsgxr2/lw3Io=

> I don't know about PPro in the integer section, but it was definitely
> OoO in branches, the memory section, and in the PFU. So, I don't see
> why they would not have had integer OoO.

For the /91 I can see some potential simplifications to keep some parts
in-order, but for the PPro it seems to me that the requirements of
precise-exceptions make it so having some parts OoO and some parts
in-order wouldn't give much benefits (if any).


        Stefan