Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <lsati1FireqU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: _tigCtcXOHOQbb5fqmGRvCYCS7U
JNTP-ThreadID: YYnLTqUhhEGH779uk7wevDN2vH4
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp
Supersedes: <IXvZ3BOW3q3Gj3IwlW-1rMcg-l8@jntp>
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 24 15:36:47 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-12-16T15:36:47Z/9143683"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 3505
Lines: 47

Le 16/12/2024 à 15:59, Sylvia Else a écrit :
> Einstein defined the the word precisely, in the sense in which he used 
> it in his analysis. Since it is a definition, it needs only be applied.
> 
> As it happens, his definition is very easy to understand, though nothing 
> turns on that.
> 
> Sylvia.

Einstein does not define anything at all. For the speed of light, Einstein 
postulates that it is invariant, but he does not explain WHY.
Hachel explains it.
The whole world is then taken with fear in front of such intelligence, and 
is afraid that Hachel, blessed be He, may the peace of Aôôôllah be upon 
him, is considered a luminary in the power of thought.
What a bunch of idiots men are!
Einstein postulates that to synchronize two watches, it is enough to send 
them a signal. LOL.
Hachel, blessed be He, peace be upon him, may he taste the paradise of 
Aôôôllah in the company of 72 eternal virgins, explains that watches 
are all insynchronizable, that they can never be synchronized, because it 
is the nature of space-time to be "like that".
He explains that this interesting but abstract synchronization consists in 
synchronizing on a point M outside our three-dimensional space, and placed 
virtually at an equal distance from all the points composing a given frame 
of reference.

Hachel, peace be upon him, may Aôôôllah invite him to taste his 
paradise and his 72 houris for intense sexual pleasures, is rewriting the 
theory of relativity by taking up its bases and explanations, to give a 
simpler and clearer vision, freed from all paradoxes and errors (the way 
scientists teach accelerated and rotating frames of reference is truly 
shameful).

No, no, no, we must not say that Eisntein defines things well.

Not only is it false, but it also prevents us from looking further and 
discovering another truth.

Il you can read french text without hatred and with interest, I explain 
the things here : 

<http://nemoweb.net/jntp?kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp/Data.Media:1>

R.H. 

-- 
Ce message a été posté avec Nemo : <https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp>