Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect.
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 07:31:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <kmr2mj58bbl1s4onjf5a5n3b8thcu4dkok@4ax.com>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.2412142206100.6565@panix3.panix.com> <vjn1kf$lhqc$1@dont-email.me> <cm60mjhbvhu5konplgv0mj5iu13s0m4g83@4ax.com> <vjpom7$17gl4$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 13:31:02 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0dbb73ee035e27bb95468b5931460c2";
	logging-data="1827056"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1K03DXqlm/W6hU6oRfaP4+f8ppBPv7Oc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sNTdNVXhM/TQeWHkrYB97anGiHI=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241217-4, 12/17/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 3717

On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:40:22 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On 12/16/2024 7:22 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 16:54:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> George Snuffalapogous had stated Mr. Trump (not President
>>>> at that time) had been found guilty of "rape", when, well,
>>>> we all know the legal technicalities and definition and
>>>> specific legal issues.
>>>
>>> He did not say "guilty".
>>>
>>> 	Donald Trump has been found liable for defaming the victim of
>>> 	that rape by a jury. It's been affirmed by a judge.
>>>
>>>> The NBC Blue Network will pay $15 million to... his
>>>> Presidential library...
>>>
>>>> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-abc-george-stephanopoulos-lawsuit-defamation-b2664508.html
>>>
>>> I'm not buying what the judge wrote last year that the plaintiff proved
>>> "rape" as commonly understood by the public even though no rape had
>>> occurred using the legal definition of "rape". The jury was asked to
>>> make a specific finding of "rape" and they said no. She still won the
>>> case on other points even if not on that point. The judge was wrong to
>>> second guess the jury here on the finding they made on a specific set of
>>> facts.
>>>
>>  From your cited article:
>> 
>> "“Donald Trump has been found liable for defaming the victim of that
>> rape by a jury,” Stephonopoulos said on ABC’s This Week at the time.
>> “It’s been affirmed by a judge.”
>> 
>> Juries in New York found Trump liable for defaming and sexually
>> abusing E Jean Carroll after he repeatedly called her a liar for
>> speaking publicly about allegations that he assaulted her in the
>> 1990s. Trump has appealed the nearly $90 million in judgments against
>> him.
>> 
>> Last year, the judge overseeing those cases wrote that Carroll’s
>> failure to “prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New
>> York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr Trump
>> ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’”
>> 
>> “Indeed, as the evidence at trial ... makes clear, the jury found that
>> Mr Trump in fact did exactly that,” US District Judge Lewis Kaplan
>> wrote."
>> 
>> Honestly Trump has a case against the judge as well.
>
>What redeeming aspect of Trump's character did George falsely besmirch?
>


If you need the facts of ABC admitted lie explained to you, you're not
worth the bytes it would take.