Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <krtm169g20O32r-vBjAWYELfSfU@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <2EXLnr_H9bJJ03uqOqvAke2Stu0@jntp> <40a7f3651fa003ba04b12ddd79ee55b1@www.novabbs.com>
 <lfp8pbFkr1mU1@mid.individual.net> <277d12ea32119cb16056773223fe1a45@www.novabbs.com> <lfrr9lF22urU4@mid.individual.net>
 <18c8d977437847653002c00e44c19d15@www.novabbs.com> <lfus9bFfohpU7@mid.individual.net> <v7delh$2sqhj$3@dont-email.me>
 <lg12nnFq3poU6@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: kS_JMLX1RNqXFstN5S4LWfbjVaU
JNTP-ThreadID: XgGFOrcTXd5ZDEX07aa-LTy0U04
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=krtm169g20O32r-vBjAWYELfSfU@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 24 00:03:50 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-01T00:03:50Z/8971182"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 3187
Lines: 41

Le 20/07/2024 à 08:11, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>> You are awfully ignorant of modern cosmology Thomas.
>> 
> Well, I had the idea, that the Doppler effect at v>c could make things 
> disappear, because redshift beyond zero Hz would create 'invisible rays'.
> 
> These 'invisible things' (emitting invisble rays) could be real, well 
> and alive, but in a different realm, into which we cannot see.
> 
> That would match the discription of a 'black hole', because things get 
> sucked in and never return.
> 
> If now that 'black hole' is 'relative', we could imagine to be there and 
> observe our Earth from there.
> 
> In this case the black hole would be here, because Earth had vanished 
> from the sight you would have from that remote location.
> 
> You could treat this phenomenon also as 'rotation of the axis of time':
> 
> if time is a local phenomenon, the remote location had its own axis of 
> time and we on Earth have our own time, too.
> 
> Now these axes have an angle towards each other.
> 
> And because c could be represented by the angle 45° in a spacetime 
> diagramm, we could imagine a realm, which exeeds this angle (at least a 
> little).
> 
> This would be a 'black hole' because the local time there drags 
> everything with it, hence nothing can return from there.
> 
> See from the other side, this black hole would be a 'white hole' and the 
> same thing, that we usually call 'big bang'.

Wir befinden uns hier in voller Science-Fiction.

Ich glaube, du schaust zu viel fern, Thomas.

R.H.