Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<l4mc5jpbplmds531km42r4mt0g8udubhan@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 22:21:18 +0000
From: john larkin <jl@650pot.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: 'Peer Reviewed' Papers - a new scam!
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:21:18 -0700
Message-ID: <l4mc5jpbplmds531km42r4mt0g8udubhan@4ax.com>
References: <v333v5$4hl8$2@dont-email.me> <6656385e$6$1258324$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v35h2b$ood3$1@dont-email.me> <66564e31$7$1258343$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <1ljc5j1ufi53boeprkt29kslqcg95n293o@4ax.com> <66565412$1$1258340$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 47
X-Trace: sv3-62B/tAE/zEok6GDGEAc/aLp6ACwECJ8/RNjxytRqVSZGX0yAnPZ+KtWKAlzQEiF8wgwMcdeCj+ndmyB!BGW8XrbKvKF7x5fF7+nzpyrU3Pjtce7K6p39xkoSayplWOuCGjT+4kvInRYOr6oxSRdf2DSgJAvW!qNKiGA==
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3626

On Tue, 28 May 2024 18:00:50 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

>On 5/28/2024 5:42 PM, john larkin wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 May 2024 17:35:46 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/28/2024 5:07 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 28 May 2024 16:02:38 -0400, bitrex wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm unsure if there have been any significant recent developments in
>>>>> conservative philosophy recently, but if there's been like, some
>>>>> paradigm-shifting discoveries in the field of wingnutology I'm open to
>>>>> reading the journals that contain them.
>>>>>
>>>>> But my impression has been that wingnutology is not shall we say a
>>>>> "highly nuanced philosophy" and that's one of the keys to its
>>>>> popularity, it doesn't need an academic journal to understand.
>>>>>
>>>>> Love guns, love Trump, have a long list of commies, queers, and
>>>>> degenerate enemies that need to get waxed, and you've basically got at
>>>>> least a bachelors of arts in the field at this time. what more is there
>>>>> to know about it. Park your pickup in a EV parking spot is the
>>>>> equivalent of a masters degree. Kick a queer or homeless person straight
>>>>> in the head and you got your PhD, easy.
>>>>
>>>> That's precisely the problem with you elitist types. You believe no one
>>>> should be allowed to express any political opinion unless they have a
>>>> degree from somewhere like Columbia or Brown. Your sort  believe it's only
>>>> permissible to espouse a view if it's couched in suitably nuanced terms -
>>>> which conveniently excludes anyone with populist, Right-wing sensibilities
>>>> who didn't have a privileged upbringing. So much for "inclusiveness" eh.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not so much about not letting anyone but academics in but more like the
>>> same reason I don't let vacuum cleaner salesmen or Jehovah's Witnesses
>>> in my front door; because populist right-wing sensibilities is 1%
>>> substance and 99% sales.
>> 
>> The USA is definitely swinging right. The lefty philosophy fails to
>> understand that there are greedy, lazy, and criminal people in the
>> world, and they need to be managed.
>
>What's to understand? The rulers of every totalitarian dump that ever 
>was figured they were doing just that and/or doing the Lords work, 
>depending.

"A conservative is a liberal that has been mugged."