Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<l5hh6lF827rU1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: groenveld@acm.org (John D Groenveld) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Still No X (Re: Catastrophe Re: Proliferating LLVMs) Date: 14 Mar 2024 23:57:10 GMT Organization: Groenveld.US Lines: 13 Message-ID: <l5hh6lF827rU1@mid.individual.net> References: <uqod44$bag$2@reader1.panix.com> <usvdns$1oga4$1@dont-email.me> <l5gveoF5essU1@mid.individual.net> <usvik9$1pnnp$1@dont-email.me> X-Trace: individual.net O5hWaoZ2gvQDtEMXjlZrAAq8Ibh93+hvZ8cgHy56H8vmee/16Q Cancel-Lock: sha1:/auf7DKYUD7IJmlgyg0qmWx90V0= sha256:1oGLTSkNwsQrXethMlzJLr7Ws9JouiGfaRDDc43h5Gk= Bytes: 1240 In article <usvik9$1pnnp$1@dont-email.me>, Steven G. Kargl <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >If one is rebuilding everything from ports, then one is >not dealing with the nightmare of dependencies from pre-built >packages (which may be out-of-sync given the dependency tree >and how the ports tree is managed) or from stale things in >a search path. There is also the possibility to tailor the pkg(8) can clean up outdated dependencies. # pkg autoremove John groenveld@acm.org