Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<l5nid3F5fapU1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math Subject: Re: ? ? ? Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 07:59:41 +0100 Lines: 27 Message-ID: <l5nid3F5fapU1@mid.individual.net> References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <EwNCN.10443611$ee1.4526609@fx16.ams4> <l42p7pF1fdhU1@mid.individual.net> <uriu05$3kjja$1@paganini.bofh.team> <l45ek0Fe0s6U1@mid.individual.net> <urobnk$3v1g$1@dont-email.me> <l4ak2fF7mb7U1@mid.individual.net> <abd1af5f6c6e172db813996bbc8a1fbd@www.novabbs.com> <l4pd6iFh9qrU1@mid.individual.net> <17ba17198d38202d$39429$138080$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <65E8186D.2220@ix.netcom.com> <65E81BB3.3B9B@ix.netcom.com> <65E81EFB.3C55@ix.netcom.com> <l4qmlfFn6jmU1@mid.individual.net> <17ba368e6628ddbc$38447$141478$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <l4t6hpF4bo3U1@mid.individual.net> <17ba8285aef2897a$523$155296$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <l4vv9tFhbj7U1@mid.individual.net> <17babf055ed1f074$1$167876$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <l52gkhFt900U1@mid.individual.net> <ush56g$2l8hb$2@paganini.bofh.team> <l55672Fb91iU1@mid.individual.net> <usjpfv$2u0sd$1@paganini.bofh.team> <l5iaguFbkcpU1@mid.individual.net> <ut1arp$9qp5$1@paganini.bofh.team> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net l6KIaCVEz3r+Wa7l42ZHzARgRkBMe5CCdKWq4e2zoP0wd/FAZz Cancel-Lock: sha1:Nuj2YT3jM8TBlRrXXPXufHDBEz0= sha256:+r1/ph7QUdoK9rk/gJQJ2ZoAx3OQ8ezUTSgCrkw4mto= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <ut1arp$9qp5$1@paganini.bofh.team> Bytes: 2862 Am 15.03.2024 um 12:19 schrieb Connie Bairashevski Balashoff: > Thomas Heger wrote: > >>> stupid. There is no Λπ½πΌπππΆπ―πΉπ_ππ΅πΆπ_πΆπ_ππΏππ²,_π½πΌπππΆπ―πΉπ_π»πΌπΛ in physics. >>> Idiot. That statement does NOT exists. >> >> No, such a statement does exist, because I had written 'possibly this is >> true, possibly not'. The actual fact is unknown, at least by me, hence >> we are allowed to speculate. Possibly time has to do with entropy, >> possibly not. If you want an answer to this riddle ('what time actually >> is'), you need to find it yourself. > > not in physics, my friend. Try π£ππ¬_πππ, ππππππ‘ππ etc, but that's stupid. The > time used in physics is pretty well defined, ππ‘π_π¨π¦ππ, by consent. You I'm not quite certain, what you are trying to say. In physics time is a quantity and measured in seconds. But that does not say very much about how long a second is and why time exists in the first place. TH