Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 09:54:52 +0200
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <l79onlFqd6dU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <b6043cf438f884321bf1b6aed55f9871@www.novabbs.org> <9YCpfbWayDDTVrmI9Yye1LKiThs@jntp> <l6kfsfFjqknU2@mid.individual.net> <WuhuOl-fQu3J7ho5vcxwxFwmlEQ@jntp> <l6puenFeh5pU1@mid.individual.net> <bigu1zNUD9n8JIWm2zHpTNzxgBQ@jntp> <l71kmnFje11U1@mid.individual.net> <660BAEAC.433D@ix.netcom.com> <l749ffF14h9U1@mid.individual.net> <KhZ2Hz2FE9CXExXJ8V8CpS5cLpw@jntp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net L94bdwv2NMmyi/qr9T07jQHZ9aXewpGLj7O6VCPT2rhkGIAdyr
Cancel-Lock: sha1:M2t59pdb6/nCCftvZSD3MAcSd1Y= sha256:PZe6bhGRzYlnO0O+2FEnNd8suRkNANULGklSZyRwKSg=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <KhZ2Hz2FE9CXExXJ8V8CpS5cLpw@jntp>
Bytes: 3474

Am 04.04.2024 um 04:18 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
> Le 03/04/2024 à 16:58, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>> Am 02.04.2024 um 09:07 schrieb The Starmaker:
>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 30.03.2024 um 11:38 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>> Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>>> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe you like my 'book'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>
....

> It is some 100 times better than the one used before.  Much less power
> consumption, far more force on the bullet which could be a guided
> missile at hypersonic speeds.
>
> As for my gun, check out
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
> Follow the link to the 2-sec video.
>
>>>
>>> and trying to connect QM and GR is...apples and oranges.
>
> Both are nonsense to me.
> When inertia is busted, entropy and relativity and quantum are also busted.
> Aether is back, filling the infinite universe.
>
> I hope you realise that one day.

I have actually written a longish critique of 'On the electrodynamics of 
moving bodies'
(here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view )

and know what you mean.

But I think, that relativity is not entirely wrong.

It is a principle, which is VERY counterintuitive and not discussed very 
often:

we have a forward and a backwards time, which both occur and are both real.

Which time is forward, that is debatable, hence both are and the other 
one is in relative motion 'backwards'.

About QM I had to criticise a few points, too.

That was mainly the particle concept itself.

Particles are assumed to be lasting entities, created shortly after the 
big bang.

But I found a counter-example: Growing Earth.

Since the Earth is in fact growing, the idea of lasting particles cannot 
be true.

So, in a way, I had to strike a few assumptions, but maintain the idea 
itself (of GR and QM).

It's not my business anyhow, since what I tried to do, that is finding 
the connection between GR and QM and didn't attempt to justify these 
branches of physics.


TH
>