Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 09:03:54 +0200
Lines: 204
Message-ID: <l7ca43F7jrnU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <l6kfsfFjqknU2@mid.individual.net> <WuhuOl-fQu3J7ho5vcxwxFwmlEQ@jntp> <l6puenFeh5pU1@mid.individual.net> <bigu1zNUD9n8JIWm2zHpTNzxgBQ@jntp> <l71kmnFje11U1@mid.individual.net> <660BAEAC.433D@ix.netcom.com> <l749ffF14h9U1@mid.individual.net> <KhZ2Hz2FE9CXExXJ8V8CpS5cLpw@jntp> <l79onlFqd6dU1@mid.individual.net> <IXQv8LazUgNGHOfaop5NsVJfpZ0@jntp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net XYmUrVBwMhyQ7GAflyD8/AoPGysUBd/XCVlb1INqtDEFKqp/O6
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fwKA+lvzIuC6AkdpVLa02I93MEQ= sha256:dxB1pigXbD7kAQSLK4IRgdNLVtegiKY/gK4aYkjx3hU=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
In-Reply-To: <IXQv8LazUgNGHOfaop5NsVJfpZ0@jntp>
Bytes: 7801

Am 06.04.2024 um 02:07 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
> Le 05/04/2024 à 18:49, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>> Am 04.04.2024 um 04:18 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>> Le 03/04/2024 à 16:58, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>> Am 02.04.2024 um 09:07 schrieb The Starmaker:
>>>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 30.03.2024 um 11:38 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>>>> Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>>>>> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you like my 'book'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>> ...
>>
>>> It is some 100 times better than the one used before.  Much less power
>>> consumption, far more force on the bullet which could be a guided
>>> missile at hypersonic speeds.
>>>
>>> As for my gun, check out
>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>>> Follow the link to the 2-sec video.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> and trying to connect QM and GR is...apples and oranges.
>>>
>>> Both are nonsense to me.
>>> When inertia is busted, entropy and relativity and quantum are also
>>> busted.
>>> Aether is back, filling the infinite universe.
>>>
>>> I hope you realise that one day.
>>
>> I have actually written a longish critique of 'On the electrodynamics
>> of moving bodies'
>> (here:
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view )
>>
>> and know what you mean.
>>
>> But I think, that relativity is not entirely wrong.
>
> It is entirely wrong from top to bottom.

'relativity' is actually an undisputable fact, because everything moves 
relative to something else.

It's such a simple fact, that hardly anybody can reject it.

There exist another view, which is based on Newton's absolute space, 
which would allow to defince velocity in respect to the universe.

This view is actually the position of Einstein in SRT, even if it is 
self-contradicting.

We can see this in the use of velocity v without definition of a 
reference point, in respect to which velocity is measured.

This would require an absolute space, which Einstein declared to not exist.


> It is not science, but Jewish dogma to get rid of the Arya notion of aum
> (aether) pervading the universe.

Religion and science are not exactly the same thing, therefore you 
should not mix believe and theoretical physics.

Physics is as natural science not concerned with religious bias and can 
simply ignore everything from whatever believe system.

That's why there exists no 'Aryan physics', but only true physics.

Whether you like it or not, whether you profit from it or if it 
undermines you believes, that isn't the business of science.

Science can only deliver truth.

> So to begin with, Einstein et al were mocked and ridiculed just as I am
> today, by the establishment.

Well, your theories are a different story, because highly efficiant rail 
guns are a politiical issue, which could eventually change the political 
worldmap.

>
> The eminence of relativity today is not due to any science, but to
> politics driven by money, media and academia on one hand, and the fear
> of nukes by the public on the other, which wrongly thinks that the great
> energies released are due to e=mcc.
>
>> It is a principle, which is VERY counterintuitive and not discussed
>> very often:
>
> It is nonsense, period.
No.

There is a guy named Tom Bearden, who wrote about it.
>>
>> we have a forward and a backwards time, which both occur and are both
>> real.
>
> A dogmatic assertion. There is NO backwards time. This is pure nonsense.
> Yes there are such things as phase differences, meaning a signal can go
> on two different paths and meet at different times at the same place,
> causing interference.
> But that does not mean that time goes backwards.

I have based my own theory upon bi-quaternions (aka 'complex four-vectors').

They form a field and are internally connected, as if they are 
multiplied together with the neighbor.

The imaginary axis builds the axis of time and the three real units the 
axes of space.

Now this construct is anti-symmetric. that means, it takes two rotations 
to return to the initial state.

After one rotation the axis of time points into the opposite direction 
and everything is fliped over to a mirror image.

Now we could assume, that such a 'world behind the mirror' does in fact 
exist, where time runs (in our view) backwards.

That world is made from anti-matter.

But seen from there our world is made from anti-matter and our time runs 
backwards.

That is actually the main priciple of relativity: that relations depend 
on the own point of view.

E.g. if I see you moving, you can see me moving and we cannot decide, 
who is correct.



>>
>> Which time is forward, that is debatable, hence both are and the other
>> one is in relative motion 'backwards'.
>
> There is ONLY forward time, or NO time in situations where there is no
> change. However even in such situations outside the situation the
> estimate of time can be done, by those in situations where things do
> change.

Sure, but time is local!

This time belongs to the local 'time domaine', to which in turn we 
belong and which we could not leave.

So: WE have only one single forward time.

But the anti-guys from that 'world behind the mirror' have a different 
time, which runs also forwward locally, bach backwards in our view.

Since rotation of the axis of time can also occur gradually, we could as 
well assume a world, where the axis of time points sideways to ours or 
in an angle.



>> About QM I had to criticise a few points, too.
>>
>> That was mainly the particle concept itself.
>>
>> Particles are assumed to be lasting entities, created shortly after
>> the big bang.
>
> Another dogmatic assertion, the big bang.  It is only a theory. How can
> a theory become accepted like fact?  Most unscientific.


Well, yes, because it was George LeMaitre, who introduced this idea and 
he was a jesuit priest.
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========