Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Scalar waves
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 07:46:54 +0200
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <l96663F16l9U1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 0C5vVMQ3vXshTnKlrhsXxge/vHRvaGbrvEyZQHEMD2agyhEkqK
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zjpZMC3QhFecXlpTJ1WCSwEdhco= sha256:LHnB2gNFPl20FWYA/F6W5Htmv2oH+WEF3lFmpHtYuU4=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 1326

Hi Ng

I had read recently something from Tom Bearden.

He wrote, that scalar waves are longitudinal waves, which vary in 
velocity and are acompanied by a wave, which runs backwards in time.

The idea is a little strange and would require to give up the constancy 
of the speed of light in vacuum, but to allow a variation of the speed 
of light in vacuum.

This would cause a wavelike behavior, but longitudinal (opposite to 
classical em-waves).

This behaviour was called 'polarized in the time-domain'.


Is this somehow correct?

(The 'backwards in time wave' is actually no prblem for me, because I 
had assumed something similar before.)

TH