| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<lNycnZghasCXPtP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 06:19:54 +0000 Subject: Re: Are We Back to the "Wars" Now ? Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <Sp-cnSz8UupYQaf6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> <vhja4p$23f5e$3@dont-email.me> From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Organization: wokiesux Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 01:19:53 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vhja4p$23f5e$3@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <lNycnZghasCXPtP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 20 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-Y7P9zCl2B3FMCXZ2wXn4EQAU7uTw4f7Z0XyszYlJ6yZn5SJAJVxeE1jSdita+gl1wnw84HJfYLCXkgq!u3oms1pqcRzuSbKAiwOqGUw+kKz7mDQGD4wpFcx75HgjSfNDXl2lgD8naUD8SrwpB8hi9fEIcxjX!PaUUNDX0a5ML4BsNMg6p X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 1985 On 11/19/24 7:22 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:20:53 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> Hey, if I feel the need to use files instead of 'pipes' then I WANT TO >> USE FILES INSTEAD OF PIPES. > > Except ... you were trying to argue that there was no fundamental > difference between pipes and files anyway. That you could somehow do > everything you could do with pipes by using temporary files. Yep. But I *just may not WANT to* :-) Files DO have a hidden advantage - many largely dis-related programs can ACCESS them. This can give you stats, insight, 'intelligence'. Pipes are basically restricted to the original parent and children. Good reasons for that, sometimes, but not *always*.