Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Windows =?UTF-8?B?U2VydmVy4oCZcw==?= Greatest Moment
Date: 10 May 2024 02:27:47 GMT
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <la5f13Fmu8eU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <v1jho9$t2ec$9@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net R/Hlzmcc28g9Ualptmxqhwfi/96UTzrChMoVDQRW/9rVNHkyzI
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LmHrRat2+oelPpTfpT9I7WEwV8s= sha256:s8D5f6Rb0xyqg49ljJlCdVEWmEWMA/MXWFAtZwzJzEI=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 1103

On Thu, 9 May 2024 22:12:25 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> Time to revisit the episode that totally and finally made clear that
> “Windows Server” and “reliability” could never go together: the London
> Stock Exchange débâcle of 2007-2011.

 It does take brass balls to say Windows Server and five nines in the same 
sentence.