Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <laaCChAXY_8xgRnremum8V38aBI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net>
 <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <v6mlhe$21277$2@dont-email.me> <9oTvw4-YSIPb1dubtdBwcc_MeX8@jntp>
 <v6ojjl$2fb4i$1@dont-email.me> <oifv2gv8lSmpEE3OlZ7h_aGUb_Q@jntp> <4cf99065c3315a022607dbb5ba0e2d5f@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: ECIThnforM7LqIGEspnahEyOniY
JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=laaCChAXY_8xgRnremum8V38aBI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 24 17:46:52 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-12T17:46:52Z/8945264"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2668
Lines: 23

Le 12/07/2024 à 17:27, tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) a 
écrit :
> 

What we must understand when we want to study the theory of relativity 
correctly, and not simply to talk about it, to show that we are a man, and 
that we have a large penis (the human guilty sin that man himself never 
wants to admit and that he represses on others), is that the notion of 
universal present DOES NOT EXIST.
Now, when I read you, I have the impression that you believe in it like 
others believe in the Blessed Virgin or in the harem-paradise where we can 
take around twenty chicks a day.
But no, that's not how it happens.
You say "at time one an event A occurs in A, there is an inctant present 
in B which considers that A has just occurred at the moment; and vice 
versa."
It's stupid.
And to think like that, that is to say that there exists in the universe a 
plane of absolute present time, is to show that we have understood 
nothing, nothing at all about the theory of relativity.
Don't laugh, friends, a man like Stephen Hawking, who was presented as a 
great man, also believed in such nonsense.

R.H.