Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<laednbB1xs-AfK76nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 23:13:33 +0000
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (doubling-spaces)
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <40ac3ed2-5648-48c0-ac8f-61bdfd1c1e20@att.net> <vgg57o$25ovs$2@dont-email.me>
 <71fea361-0069-4a98-89a4-6de2eef62c5e@att.net> <vggh9v$27rg8$3@dont-email.me>
 <ff2c4d7c-33b4-4aad-a6b2-88799097b86b@att.net> <vghuoc$2j3sg$1@dont-email.me>
 <d79e791d-d670-4a5a-bd26-fdf72bcde6bc@att.net> <vgj4lk$2ova9$3@dont-email.me>
 <f154138e-4482-4267-9332-151e2fd9f1ba@att.net> <vgkoi7$b5pp$1@solani.org>
 <6d9f3b10-47ad-459c-9536-098ce91f514b@att.net> <vgni02$3osmc$1@dont-email.me>
 <16028da0-456b-47ad-8baa-7982a7cbdf10@att.net> <vgpupb$abrr$2@dont-email.me>
 <vgr5fo$i3h7$2@dont-email.me> <vgsh2q$t7fk$2@dont-email.me>
 <6cba8e3a-03b3-4a7b-9f0f-bd6c3f282080@att.net>
 <vuudnd3N5rHQya_6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <sFidna5nJLTKyK_6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <a4552de3-bc31-4713-88fa-4a6586b90805@att.net>
 <OOSdnahYzp3E7a_6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <EtGdnXXmVtiZDq76nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <35237069-8224-4bc8-835a-9d47b1edff3f@att.net>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:13:23 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <35237069-8224-4bc8-835a-9d47b1edff3f@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <laednbB1xs-AfK76nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 96
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-pVCDQwQ/EM0C3WecLLqOLKaLat9ukr4vKCdCVVJIe79/3OvbF1hYqdU9VvKJAswtVNm9ScfGlmAdhrU!oQgvrnm6pKooxaMQt5ter7lJ/H8e3SueDB4BLcApMpmpI4mLrKlcRO2gssWoBHzCIbXAHIQK1BPS
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4825

On 11/12/2024 01:36 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 11/12/2024 12:40 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 11/11/2024 12:59 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2024 12:09 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
>>>> On 11/11/2024 2:04 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>> On 11/11/2024 11:00 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/11/2024 10:38 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Our sets do not change.
>>>>>>> Everybody who believes that
>>>>>>>   intervals could grow in length or number
>>>>>>> is deeply mistaken about
>>>>>>>   what our whole project is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about Banach-Tarski equi-decomposability?
>>>>
>>>> The parts do not change.
>
>>> any manner of partitioning said ball or its decomposition,
>>> would result in whatever re-composition,
>>> a volume, the same.
>
>> So, do you reject the existence of these?
>
> No.
>
> What I mean by "The parts do not change" might be
> too.obvious for you to think useful.to.state.
> Keep in mind with whom I am primarily in discussion.
> I am of the strong opinion that
> "too obvious" is not possible, here.
>
> Finitely.many pieces of the ball.before are
>   associated.by.rigid.rotations.and.translations to
> finitely.many pieces of two same.volumed balls.after.
>
> They are associated pieces.
> They are not the same pieces.
>
> Galileo found it paradoxical that
> each natural number can be associated with
> its square, which is also a natural number.
> But 137 is associated with 137²
> 137 isn't 137²
>
> I don't mean anything more than that.
> I hope you agree.
>
>> Mathematics doesn't, ....
>
> Mathematics thinks 137 ≠ 137²
>
>

1 = 1^2
0 = 0^2

2 + 2 = 2^2

1 + 1 =/= 1^2

1/phi = phi - 1

The doubling-spaces and doubling-measures are
a feature of quasi-invariant measure theory
with regards to the mathematical act of
individuation of a continuum.

With regards to the mathematical act: a mathematical fact.

Then, many would rather have that
they don't need your "pro-tection",
and that it gives higher thoughts short-shrift.

The densities of the integers and rationals,
or integers and squares,
or about the square-free numbers,
or about the primes,
have distinct expressions.

In the real values, ....


It's much appreciated a _usual_
"mathematical conscience", and a
thoroughly contemplative and deliberative
addressal of the import, and, limitations,
of plain "non-self-contradictory, inductive inference.

Then here the differences in "unboundedness" and
"density", do have that "density" remains defined,
including in the unbounded. Also it's a size relation.

Good luck and warm regards kind sirs