Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lbg_CbOVz9jZE9idxLGB-N_ZuwM@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <lbg_CbOVz9jZE9idxLGB-N_ZuwM@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Incorrect mathematical integration References: <EKV4LWfwyF4mvRIpW8X1iiirzQk@jntp> <v7ri3a$1rs1b$1@dont-email.me> <ftN6UmDr7W62aPoOQpYysEUFAh8@jntp> <v7rp5h$1t5kp$1@dont-email.me> <BQ5j0PykzttrIMqyw16zXh2VQVU@jntp> <v7u8d2$2dodj$1@dont-email.me> <WxEQQfYMZ9Ktt8wAuyCpiQ5L8Tg@jntp> <v807nm$2rgp7$1@dont-email.me> <Y1zx7pfoPsbKo0KHuPJBLUEcaI0@jntp> <v80usp$2vjv9$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: 0PFBbQmLQsOak4o2Sk0DuijXLV4 JNTP-ThreadID: Ptg0buW51I-Cbbzx-mVW15r6pQg JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=lbg_CbOVz9jZE9idxLGB-N_ZuwM@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Fri, 26 Jul 24 20:18:51 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-26T20:18:51Z/8965124"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> Bytes: 2439 Lines: 20 Le 26/07/2024 à 21:54, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : > Den 26.07.2024 18:14, skrev Richard Hachel: >> Le 26/07/2024 à 15:18, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : >>>> But if I measure with the watch that the proton wears on his left >>>> wrist, I will measure a time of τ = 12.0727 ns. > > Right again. > This is a trivial fact, disputed by no one. It is not a question of discussing what is of rare evidence in both theories. We must remain simple. We have here two theories, and it is infinitely probable that one of the two is correct. The problem is that on certain concepts, we do not agree. It is therefore certain that if there is an error, the error is there. It cannot be found where we agree as here, or when each one poses: To=(x/c).sqrt(1+2c²/ax) to determine the observable time of an accelerated object. R.H.