Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Do Microsofts Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
Date: 31 May 2024 02:28:50 GMT
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <lbsqv1FikgbU5@mid.individual.net>
References: <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.24--8.34pm.Seattle.2024>
	<dd545j9s32ugnbptlsp0pd6anbpjlh9j0h@4ax.com>
	<9s645j1pehkhdkc7kjj3hbp2nnu93c4mfc@4ax.com>
	<66523fb2$0$1258345$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
	<v2u2cj$33vus$1@dont-email.me> <v2v9fr$3daer$4@dont-email.me>
	<v2vc53$3dkln$3@dont-email.me> <v30g0c$3lhel$3@dont-email.me>
	<slrnv5a4g0.8c8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
	<v33c75$ddl1$4@dont-email.me>
	<slrnv5aeav.hse.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
	<v33tqh$ftv1$1@dont-email.me> <uglb5jho4cn959nosc8di0lai52p4tftb6@4ax.com>
	<v35pqb$qao6$4@dont-email.me> <QDE5O.17083$8CY1.7172@fx37.iad>
	<v37pqs$18058$3@dont-email.me> <geL5O.4$Inzb.3@fx13.iad>
	<v39nrm$1lipm$5@dont-email.me> <mE_5O.630$RsQ5.174@fx42.iad>
	<v3a5qb$1oc32$1@dont-email.me> <As26O.14039$G7Za.7906@fx10.iad>
	<v3ant4$1rcde$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net V+7Lwpc7jsPwYxJynB5kqQmzelMiHjp1th//Tsy5XQE2mUvrMT
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0um7ndAc+m9K0meyquMGCIVHtOc= sha256:qGiDhrgnXaMPkI8XNtgZsqu3G93ExkRuOu31Yej/kG4=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 2061

On Thu, 30 May 2024 16:34:44 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Sorry, but that's your take. I will say that GUIs that don't hide
> scrollbars (until you hover near them), that have some depth to them to
> indicate controls versus non-functional areas, and don't have invisible
> functional areas that you have to stumble onto to find them, are better.
> In that regard, the Win 2000 desktop qualifies.

The magical vanishing scrollbar! I'd like to stake the person who came up 
with that on a hill of fire ants.