Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <lcUcDbWtK0WeTGWawNs9QhziP2s@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Space and spacetime
References: <v4k05l$3agjr$3@paganini.bofh.team> <IZqLWu0r1pGumkx88v-OnXgTbLY@jntp>
 <a9d511e73e3581ce0ed8753f07619f01@www.novabbs.com> <ayoldiJgLa7QaSPmKBZeM5tyhng@jntp> <ldad1pFlf8nU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: O-fKaqplk3KG5NC9FmlKnyb1Hwo
JNTP-ThreadID: v4i6s0$31ct8$1@dont-email.me
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=lcUcDbWtK0WeTGWawNs9QhziP2s@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 24 13:13:58 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-06-17T13:13:58Z/8905799"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 2864
Lines: 40

Le 17/06/2024 à 11:13, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :
> On 2024-06-16 21:28:01 +0000, Richard Hachel said:
> 
>> Le 16/06/2024 à 22:46, film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) a écrit :
>>> Richard Hachel wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Le 15/06/2024 à 14:07, Roeidi Hegedüs a écrit :
>>>>> Luigi Fortunati wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Einstein's formulas work better than Newton's and that's a fact.
>>>>> 
>>>>> no shit Sherlock.
>>> 
>>>> Hachel's formulas work better than Einstein's and that's a fact.
>>> 
>>> Nonsense.
>>> --
>>> Jan
>> 
>> Lorsqu'on accuse quelqu'un, il faut des preuves concordantes et 
>> acceptées de tous.
> 
> 
> Have you convinced anyone at all that your analysis is correct? Who?

I don't know.
I do not think so.
But this is not a counterargument.
Raël, the guru of the Canadian sect, has made thousands of followers,
explaining that he had spoken to the Elohims.
De Gaulle was not followed by anyone in explaining that occupied France 
had not yet lost the war as long as the Russians, the English, and the 
Americans continued the fight.
The fact of convincing or not convincing is not proof of lie or truth.
It is often even the opposite.
This is also what the Christian religion, Eastern philosophers, Western 
fabulists, and sociological evidence tell us.
We must therefore judge on what is said, and on what is written, and not 
on what is claimed.

R.H.