Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<lcUcDbWtK0WeTGWawNs9QhziP2s@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <lcUcDbWtK0WeTGWawNs9QhziP2s@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Space and spacetime References: <v4k05l$3agjr$3@paganini.bofh.team> <IZqLWu0r1pGumkx88v-OnXgTbLY@jntp> <a9d511e73e3581ce0ed8753f07619f01@www.novabbs.com> <ayoldiJgLa7QaSPmKBZeM5tyhng@jntp> <ldad1pFlf8nU1@mid.individual.net> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: O-fKaqplk3KG5NC9FmlKnyb1Hwo JNTP-ThreadID: v4i6s0$31ct8$1@dont-email.me JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=lcUcDbWtK0WeTGWawNs9QhziP2s@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Mon, 17 Jun 24 13:13:58 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-06-17T13:13:58Z/8905799"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> Bytes: 2864 Lines: 40 Le 17/06/2024 à 11:13, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit : > On 2024-06-16 21:28:01 +0000, Richard Hachel said: > >> Le 16/06/2024 à 22:46, film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) a écrit : >>> Richard Hachel wrote: >>> >>>> Le 15/06/2024 à 14:07, Roeidi Hegedüs a écrit : >>>>> Luigi Fortunati wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Einstein's formulas work better than Newton's and that's a fact. >>>>> >>>>> no shit Sherlock. >>> >>>> Hachel's formulas work better than Einstein's and that's a fact. >>> >>> Nonsense. >>> -- >>> Jan >> >> Lorsqu'on accuse quelqu'un, il faut des preuves concordantes et >> acceptées de tous. > > > Have you convinced anyone at all that your analysis is correct? Who? I don't know. I do not think so. But this is not a counterargument. Raël, the guru of the Canadian sect, has made thousands of followers, explaining that he had spoken to the Elohims. De Gaulle was not followed by anyone in explaining that occupied France had not yet lost the war as long as the Russians, the English, and the Americans continued the fight. The fact of convincing or not convincing is not proof of lie or truth. It is often even the opposite. This is also what the Christian religion, Eastern philosophers, Western fabulists, and sociological evidence tell us. We must therefore judge on what is said, and on what is written, and not on what is claimed. R.H.